User talk:Mintumondal24

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unified Infotech (May 14)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Unified_Infotech Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello Mintumondal24. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mintumondal24. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 13:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello Binadea,

I have recevied your messages today.

To be very honest I am not being directly or indirectly compansated for any group, organization or any person. As you know that I am in new on Wikipedia and so I want to write a new article for myself. I studied many times on how to write an article on wikipedia and I even also talked with User:Sulfurboy. He guided me that do not write any article and it is really frustration. He aslo told me that If I really want to write an article then I would have to edit some existing articles an all that's why I have been tring to edit some resources and draft article since I joined here. I have seen that there are lots of draft still pending. I was planning to edit next draft to enhance my skill on wikipedia. I did my first Economic_impact_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_in_India here. I tried to give proper citations of any articles whenever I add some information but I do not know it may not be helpful for you that's why you removed all the inforamtion. I want to write an article for myself with proper resouces and citation. If you think that whatever I contributed on wikipedia is worthless then you could have the right to remove my contribution from wikipedia.

Once again, I have no intention to promote any services or to get compansated from any group, person or any company.

Kindly do let me know what information do you need from me? I am ready to provide you all the details.


 * Except for one or two edits, all your edits to Wikipedia have added links to or otherwise promoted the company Unified Infotech. It is rather difficult to believe that half a dozen new contributors would, independently of each other, believe that the blog posts promoting this non-notable company were relevant sources for Wikipedia articles. Especially since the content of the added references hasn't actually supported any of the information in the articles. Please do not post any more links or content about Unified Infotech, and please do not create any other accounts to promote the company, as it violates Wikipedia's policy on using one account as well as the policy on paid editing. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for concerning me. I thought the links could be relevant on wikipedia. Like I said earlier, I have no intention to promote any company's links or services. No issues I will not post any links or content about unified infotech. As far I know wikipedia can track IP addess. Since I have been created my account, you can have tracked my IP address. I specially open wikipedia site from my mobile or desktop. You can track me as well. I will not violate wikiepdia's policy.

Now I would like to create an article for myself. Can I create it now? Kindly help me! Looking forward for a positive reply.

One more thing, I have seen there are lots of links which has not valid resource to Wikipedia. Those links have still present on Wikipedia. If you want to see I will you some examples. You should have aware of this. As far I know, Wikipedia is the knowledge based platform where user gets all information that he or she is looking for.

I am not willing to promote any links or services honestly. Thanks, Mintumondal24


 * A very small number of exceptionally trusted volunteers are able to see users' IP addresses, under certain conditions. I am not one of those, and I can't see your IP address. The prohibition on creating and using multiple accounts deceptively is not tied to which IP address is in use – it is a policy that applies to people, not devices.


 * When you say "an article for myself", do you mean an article about yourself? If so, please read this information.


 * Yes, there are sometimes spam links in Wikipedia articles, although there are fairly good measures in place to hinder that. If you are certain that a link does not meet these conditions you can remove it, but it may be better to ask for guidance first. The Tea house is a good place to ask for input. Important: That an external link in a reference is dead usually does not mean that the reference is no longer valid, and it is almost never appropriate to replace an external link in a reference with a link to a different website. --bonadea contributions talk 16:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you for sugestions. I will keep in mind.