User talk:Minturncolorado

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Minturn, Colorado appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Man way  07:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Minturn, Colorado. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Come on. Keep it encyclopedic. Stop your POV pushing.'' Man  way  07:41, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Minturn, Colorado, you may be blocked from editing. ''It's getting close. Stop now or be blocked.'' Man  way  07:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Minturn, Colorado, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Man way  07:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

not sure why i got blocked manway seems to be the one that has a personal interest in this. i tried to update with court orders and what is currently happening in minturn. i showed no opinion just facts that were correct by a court order. how is a court order one sided. once again manway has a personal interest in this. please unblock me so i can give a 2011 update for minturn. thanks


 * Minturn: I have no personal interest in the town. I had never heard of it before I discovered your editing. I advise you to read WP:NOTNEWS, WP:3RR and WP:NPOV. In a nutshell, we are an encyclopedia. We are not a newspaper. Stick to the facts about the town. Not the infighting between the residents and the council. That does not belong here. Court orders, current events, and the like have no place here. Just neutral point of view facts about the town.


 * Oh, and if you wish to be unblocked, follow the instructions to request it. Your message here will not be read by any administrators unless you add the code required around your request. For that code, see the block notice above. -- Man way  08:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

manway you are a paid puppet of dean adler. the article mentions the annexation why can i not mention the court order to reverse the annexation. oh dean adler just pulled your puppet strings go dance for him.


 * One more thing to read: Assume Good Faith. Have a wonderful evening. -- Man way  09:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

{{unblock reason you people are not making any sense. you have information dating back over three years with no update for 2011. an out of towner will think minturn has two golf courses and two gondolas new sewer plant and new facilities and minturn never will. you spew the developers interest so you are allowing a one sided propaganda about the developer. i understand rich people like dean adler control little weasels like you but do not put on a fake face that you are fair. minturn is outdated on wiki and it needs to be corrected. plus why has materialscientist not unblocked me. you have an outdated reference to www.minturncitizensforannexation that is pro developer yet you do not provide the citizens against annexation view. the court order is very important to outsiders because an outsider can see that there will be no two golf courses etc, this is a fact that needs to be corrected. there is no infighting. there simple will be no golf courses, no gondolas, no new waste water plant, etc. i am not confused about wiki i undestand that you are part of a one sided web site. you state wiki is not a newspaper yet you mention the annexation vote from a newspaper yet you do not mention a court order from the same newspaper. unblock me so i can update minturn correctly. i can verify all my information can you, dean adler puppetMinturncolorado (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)]]
 * I already removed information about some annexation vote from the article; it wasn't at all useful to an encyclopedia article. You've formatted your request incorrectly, so it wasn't added to the block review queue, but if you decide to request unblock again, please understand that no one is going to unblock you until you can show that you understand why your edits were not helpful, and can make a good case that your future participation would be likely to make the encyclopedia better.  Do you have any interest in making the encyclopedia better that aren't related to supporting your side of a political disagreement in your own town?  There are many other small towns in the world, and many of them have little more than geographic information in their articles.  If you knew what information goes in a good encyclopedia article, you could volunteer to expand articles about the little towns that other people live in.  Just using the 'random article' button, I found articles that need useful expansion on less-famous places:  Schatzenstein, Bareilles, Deuli, Bangladesh, and Deuli, India.  What would you do to make the encyclopedia better if you were an active Wikipedia volunteer? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In response to your attempt at a personal attack- I have no idea who "Dean Adler" is. I don't even know whether 'Dean' is a name or a title in that phrase.  I don't care very much, either.  I doubt that anyone you've interacted with at Wikipedia knows who that person is, or cares about the politics of your town.  We're just interested in making the encyclopedia better, nothing else. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)