User talk:Minzu2682

Proposed deletion of Ajimf Creek
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ajimf Creek, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * HOAX. No mention on google of Ajimf Creek, plus thoroughly unlikely Latin name for a rat provides proof for this assertion.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Steamroller Assault (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Yemmeth nettle
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Yemmeth nettle, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lerderderg Pit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lerderderg Pit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Supposedly sourced to "local knowledge", this is the creation of an editor all of whose other contributions appear to be hoaxes. Even if the "local knowledge" were genuine, which there is strong reason to doubt, this is unverifiable. Searches turn up no documentation of any such thing.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits 18:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)