User talk:MiracleJAC

Your username
With this edit you said that you are not Miracle-Josette A. Creighton. In that case, please request a change of username by clicking on WP:Changing username, reading to the bottom of that page, clicking on "Simple" and following the instructions. Our username policy includes: "Do not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name." You can choose a name based on your own real name, or not, as you prefer (see WP:REALNAME for some considerations), but it must not be the name of another real person, or of a group or company. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you,

JSmith

More advice
Your new post was deleted because we do not like readers of the encyclopedia to come on "watch this space" articles. If you want to take time over making an article, go to Help:Userspace draft and enter the title: that will create a draft page in your "user space" where you can work on it, with a link to useful advice and a button to submit the article, when it is ready, to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will look at it and either accept it or give you feedback.

Before you do that, please change your username by going to WP:CHU.

Then, before you start, read WP:Your first article and think hard about notability. That is the criterion Wikipedia uses to decide which subjects should have articles, and it is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? More information at WP:Notability (people).

That is quite a demanding test, and many good and worthy people and organizations do not pass it. That is not at all to their discredit, but it means they are not suitable subjects for an encyclopeda. In Ms Creighton's resume which you copied from the website, I did not see anything which suggested to me that she is notable in Wikipedia's terms. Unless you can find references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, you will be wasting your time, and would do better to make a page for her at another site like Myspace or Wikibios.

If you decide to go ahead, read WP:Your first article again, write in your own words, do not copy from other websites, and take care not to use a promotional tone or glowing adjectives, or to make it seem like a CV or resume. An encyclopedia is not here boost or promote anything or anyone, and Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view.

I am telling you all this not to discourage you, but to save you wasting your time. People often spend a great deal of time and energy trying to submit articles which never had a chance, and it is better if they understand in advance what is acceptable.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)