User talk:Miraclepine/Archive 3

DYK for Harrison family of Virginia
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Rei Matsuzaki
--valereee (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (parliamentarians)


Hello, Miraclepine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Old Etonians by occupation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 04:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't want you to feel the need to rush your next appeal, so I have already edited the draft to make it "unstale". Sorry for the inconvenience, CptViraj. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 08:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films set in the 2140s


A tag has been placed on Category:Films set in the 2140s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films set in the 2150s


A tag has been placed on Category:Films set in the 2150s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films set in the 2170s


A tag has been placed on Category:Films set in the 2170s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Bakuryū Sentai Abaranger characters


Hello, Miraclepine. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Bakuryū Sentai Abaranger characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Guinean expatriate sportspeople in Iceland


A tag has been placed on Category:Guinean expatriate sportspeople in Iceland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (law and judges)
Hello, Miraclepine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (law and judges), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (sportsmen)
Hello, Miraclepine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (sportsmen), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (parliamentarians)
Hello, Miraclepine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (parliamentarians), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Peter Dix wiki page
Hi there, I was wondering what motivated you to create the page on Peter Dix? Was it simply that you read the news article you cite as a reference, and decided to make a page for everyone on the Irish sailing team?

I'm curious because that article ("ref 1") does not mention his death in the Lockerbie Bombings, so I'm just trying to understand what your connection to this individual is.

Thank you.

Gagaboatly (talk) 01:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (politicians)
Hello, Miraclepine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation (politicians), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation
Hello, Miraclepine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Old Etonians by occupation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Massachusetts elections


A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Massachusetts elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:28, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Nebraska elections


A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Nebraska elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 in Massachusetts


A tag has been placed on Category:2024 in Massachusetts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 in Nebraska


A tag has been placed on Category:2024 in Nebraska indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Giorgos Georgiou (Cypriot politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgos Georgiou (Cypriot politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Giorgos Georgiou (Cypriot politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 20:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:SK4" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:SK4. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chasey Lain


A tag has been placed on Chasey Lain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Chasey Lain. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spartaz Humbug! 21:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Stewards has been nominated for deletion
Category:Stewards has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 14:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mizoram MLAs 1988–1993


A tag has been placed on Category:Mizoram MLAs 1988–1993 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2014 WAFF Championship


A tag has been placed on Category:2014 WAFF Championship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"unnecessary redirect; not an R from category navigation; impedes category navigation on both sides, creating a duplicate link to 2013"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 17:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

March 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for WP:CIR: repeatedly warned to stop creating work on admin boards about things that they don’t know about, but refusal to listen.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC) I personally struggle with the same issues that you have, as Tony can attest. I also personally like you and would be upset to see you file an unblock request likely to fail. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I apologize for my behavior and I will promise to read the guide to appealing blocks. What will it take to get me unblocked? ミラP 14:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If you wish to appeal, read WP:GAB and make an appeal on your talk page. Unless it’s very good, however, I’m not likely to be supportive as you’ve been unable to heed warnings in the past and find new ways to do the same thing after being warned. Any appeal would have to convince people that all the drama would stop. I believe you’re sorry, but you’ve been sorry in the past, so it doesn’t give us much to go on. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll spend the week trying to figure out my appeal, and I promise to use "show preview". Also you forgot to block my "Miraclepine Amour II" account. And yes, I'd like to withdraw from the WikiCup even if I am unblocked. ミラP 14:48, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * In doing so, I'd like to offer you the opportunity to contribute to Scots Wikipedia where I am admin. It generally can be helpful for users to show themselves being productive on other Wikimedia projects. Sco.wiki could really use the contributors, but please only take this into consideration as a factor while crafting your response.
 * That offer is interesting because Scots is the one language most similar to English and has a separate Wikipedia, but I already have Wikidata and the English versions of Wikisource and Wiktionary in mind, and I promise not to cause the same enwiki problems on any of those projects. ミラP 15:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * [Thank you for the ping] I've edited English Wikisource, and it is a pretty great place to retreat to (or was for me). The users there are rather helpful, and I'd say that might be just the right fit for you if Scots Wikipedia isn't your style. { &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I'm currently writing an appeal now, and I promise it'll be here once I have time. ミラP 16:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * And now my appeal is here. [moved to unblock template at request of .]
 * Best, ミラP 16:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought you were going to take a week to write this? Either way, you should read WP:GAB more thoroughly. You didn't format this right. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:08, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * @MP, FYI, but not using the unblock template is a mistake for two reasons. Firstly, it will not appear in CAT:UNBLOCK, so your appeal will remain invisible except to page watchers, and secondly, it suggests you have not, in fact, read WP:GAB as the blocking admin advised you to. ——  SN  54129  17:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought It would take a week, but I guess it was quicker than I thought somehow., fine I'll move it to the unblock template. ミラP 17:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request
Thanks. I would like to agree to the standard offer. ミラP 18:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Miraclepine, I am sorry that it came to this. I had hoped for more limited restraint on you, but I was not aware of the extent of previous problems.
 * But since this is where it got to, I want to echo Bbb23's advice: work out your real life issues, and only then then maybe consider Wikipedia again.
 * And if you decide to return, then by far the best way to contribute is to create content. Wikipedia is overflowing with wannabe wiki-politicians and wannabe-admins, but we don't have enough content creators, and the best admins are those who have significant experience in content creation ('cos that's what Wikipedia is for); too many of those who aspire adminship lack many of the required qualities. Specialise in one narrow type of topic, and build up expertise in that area:
 * Learn how to find and use the reliable sources relating to those topics. Don't just be a Google jockey; read books, and scholarly papers and newspaper archives.
 * Learn how the content policies apply to use of sources.
 * Learn the relevant style guides
 * Above all learn to identify and work with (rather than against) experienced content creators in that topic area. Actively seek out editors who disagree with you and approach them with an open mind and willingness to learn.
 * Content creators are very welcome, but wannabe wiki-politicians can rapidly run into trouble. If your standard offer request after a break is just more of the same, things are unlikely to go well for you, but if you come back with a mission to create encyclopedic content of whatever type you have chosen, then you'll have a much better chance.
 * Good luck! -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 22:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I've already read the advice you gave me. I've already agreed to the standard offer, and I promise I will do things better once I return. ミラP 23:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , you should read the page on the standard offer. You'll need to wait six months first, without making any edits. Even anonymous ones. And the admins have the right to say no. I think it is more important to take Bbb23's words to heart about it not being a good idea to be editing Wikipedia right now. Focus on your life first. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've already read the standard offer page. ミラP 04:57, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Fwiw. I’m of the “only use the talk page to appeal the block” school (pace Floq.) I’d suggest to both you and others to keep it to that.Also, on a purely human note, I agree with Bbb23. If Wikipedia is your outlet for RL issues that’s fine (not therapy, but it is an outlet for many people) but you shouldn’t let this project become real life. As a functionary, I have to deal with the intersection of RL and Wikipedia almost daily and it honestly sucks but I do it as a service because I truly believe in the cause. At the same time, RL is 1000x more important and getting healthy mentally is part of that. It looks like Wikipedia is conflicting with your real life ideals. When that happens, give up Wikipedia. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * +1 ミラP 22:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

TPA restored
So user can place unblock request here, per UTRS 30430 and discussion with blocking admin. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 23:30, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for cleaning up my UTP. I also removed a few more notices that I personally felt were distracting. Now I can finally think calmly here. ミラP 22:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for restoring TPA so I can ready my unblock request. ミラP 22:50, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I've figured out what to say to BHG. I think it would be best to ping her, right? ミラP 14:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you still here? Have you figured out what to do here? I've decided to apologize to BHG so I would like to ping her. ミラP 19:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry. Your request is listed at CAT:RFU. It is backlogged. does this suffice for unblocking?21:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * For what it’s worth, my opinion is that they won’t be an asset to the project, which is my standard for actively supporting an unblock, but I don’t oppose someone else who has a higher opinion of ROPE than me unblocking. Use your judgement. I’m fine with it if you are. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That's okay. If you've decided what to do with the unblock request, please let me know right here. ミラP 21:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I note that your recent behavior in the Japanese Wikipedia is disruptive. From 6 May 2020 to 13 May 2020, you tag bombed over 1,000 articles. Such a behavior is unacceptable and I had to leave a warning at ja:利用者‐会話:Miraclepine. Reading your reply in Japanese, I wonder if you understand what I'm truly saying. I personally don't think it's the right time to get unblocked. 153.228.109.166 (talk) 22:43, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I took a look at your message, and I stopped the tagging. I was able to understand your message, and what you said made me realize that if I wanted to survive here, I had to stick to what I know. ミラP 22:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Other than that, I've been very fine being productive on Wikidata and the English Wikisource and I'm asking for a second chance. I'd ping you if it works on IPs which it doesn't. ミラP 22:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Besides, I got my knowledge of Japanese from watching anime and writing articles about Japan topics. I still used the Google Translate tool to write said articles because it's faster and helps me learn. ミラP 23:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Sigh. People appealing to ROPE on their own behalf don’t give me much hope as it’s usually used as GETOUTOFJAILFREE for 6 months after, and your response makes me think the same here. I think we’d have to with wikilawyering over competence issues for the next year. You know the right things to say, but you’ve never been able to actually stop running into issues after you promise to change one thing. The IP raised a good point, and I think the ja.wiki example is probably more relevant than Wikidata or wikisource: the former is mainly used by bots and the latter is dead. The additional revelation that they’ve been trying to contribute to a major Wikipedia via google translate isn’t particularly confidence inspiring either. Anyway, that’ll be my last comment here unless a reviewing admin wants thoughts. Like I said, anyone who is more convinced than I am is free to unblock if they wish. I mean that and there really isn’t opposition in any formal sense, just skepticism having dealt with this user previously. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)


 * His urge to say something to BHG suggests that he doesn’t get it. Everything that had to do with BHG was him getting out of his depth, far from content contribution. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I did the google search because I was at the time overprotective of my creations to the point that I wanted to win, but after that block I no longer have any problem with any time her opinions differ from mine, so I would like to apologize to . Also, BHG told me to gain expertise in some area, but my unblock request makes it clear I already have experience with creating articles on anime, Japan, and foreign politicians. (In case you wanna ask, an article can be related to anime and have no connection to Japan.) Also back at Wikidata I've had experience with merging The Peerage duplicate items and with mix'n'match. That's exactly what I wanted to say to BHG. I'm still interested into content creation. ミラP 01:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note
 * Note the context, and my statement Propose interaction ban, User:Miraclepine to stay clear of BHG. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If allowed back, stay clear of BHG. While apologies are nice, what it really means is you going straight back to areas where you are not suited.  And it is not specific to her.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea. I still wanted to tell her something before I would do so, and I did. I'll promise to stick to what I know. ミラP 14:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I just looked at the thread and the four evidences (one is archived here), and I find myself very appalled at my own behaviour in all of them. Guess you were right. My decision to post that thread was "frivolous, vexations, without basis", and I now realize my decision to post that ANI thread three months ago was completely disruptive. It all happened because I was overprotective of my stuff, and because I didn't focus enough on what I'm very good at: creating articles and doing DYK (ex. Barbara d'Ursel de Lobkowicz, Vilson Pedro Kleinübing, Kito Junqueira, Elena Bonetti, Kiuchi Kyō, Danzen! Futari wa Pretty Cure, Jean Delumeau (exp), Ofelia Fernández, Miyagi Tamayo, Haru Nishioka, Ruriko Aoki, Hirata Hide, Asami Tano, Hinata Satō, Coco Hayashi, Lai Pin-yu (exp), Hisashi Katsuta, Midori Katō (exp), Shugo Nakamura, Rei Matsuzaki, my Precious etc.). ミラP 19:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Before I log out for the night, I’d like to clarify the "trying to contribute to a major Wikipedia via google translate" statement; I’ve actually translated jawiki articles into English here, and some of them have appeared on DYK. ミラP 05:20, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, i would like to state that I have never used Google Translate to make significant contributions to other Wikipedias beside the English Wikipedia (this one in fact). ミラP 14:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm pinging you because two weeks have passed since the request was open. I shall now clarify and add a few more things here:
 * BHG told me "content creators are always welcome", and I've created a lot of articles, particularly the examples I listed above, so I'm pretty sure I've known "[h]ow the content policies apply to use of sources" and've had familiarity with style guidelines since I started creating articles last year.
 * This month, an ArbCom decision recently established 8-0 (my emphasis): An editor's positive and valuable contributions in one aspect of his or her participation on Wikipedia do not excuse misbehavior or questionable judgment in another aspect of participation, but may be considered in determining the sanction to be imposed, as may be done here. (PBlock? TBan? IBan?) Therefore I shall present my positive and valuable contributions in addition to the ones I listed in the unblock request:
 * In addition to the DYKs I listed above, I've generously DYK'ed work done by other people:
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Dedham Covenant
 * Template:Did you know nominations/History of anarchism
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Yoga Body
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Soldier Blade
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Moff Gideon
 * My personal favorite: Template:Did you know nominations/Harrison family of Virginia (mostly because of the April Fools joke)
 * I've also worked extensively on the English Wikipedia's lists of Old Harrovians and Old Carthusians while mostly relying on digitised versions of school registers available at the Internet Archive and the English Wikisource, and I still have those draft lists of Old Etonians by occupation to finish.
 * As for Women In Red, I'm a prolific contributor to #1day1woman. I still retain my intention to be flexible with my contributions to Women In Red.
 * If possible, I am more inclined than before to go with SmokeyJoe's idea on an IBan between me and BHG.
 * As for my contributions to Wikidata:
 * I've made so much contributions there it's even exceeded my enwiki edit count; in fact I just got my 100,000th edit there a few days ago.
 * I've gained awesome experience with Mix'n'match and QuickStatements, and I use the latter to mass-create Wikisource pages in cookie-cutter style.
 * Even though there's no mix'n'match catalog, I also add Who's Who (UK) IDs (P4638), preferably at least a hundred a day.
 * I'm merging a lot of duplicates from the Peerage (it may have been deprecated as a source here, but at least valuable parts are sourced to non-online sources like Burke's Peerage 2003 and Burke's Irish Family Records 1976) and Kindred Britain databases. I also frequent this page. I use Wikidata's search engine for a lot of maintenance tasks, for example to identify Peerage duplicates of bishops by searching "rt rev" (the prefix for bishops) and "peerage person"/"born"/"died" (most Peerage-created items have a short description with either "Peerage person ID=######" or a lifespan, but (YYYY-YYYY) is hard to search), though a few false positives there may creep up.
 * Every day (preferably twice a day) I add English-language short descriptions (and less often labels) to items of recently deceased people.
 * Bots apparently do a larger fraction of work there than in enwiki, but Wikidata has a big human community. It even has oversighters and checkusers; in fact we just got our first local CUs a month ago.
 * As for Wikisource, it's not dead, it's still thriving with a lot of works to that need transcribing, though it does have a smaller community than Wikpiedia. At the English Wikisource I often transcribe the Alumni Oxonienses if I have time.
 * I would also like to reiterate that I have not evaded this block while logged-out, especially since the last time I first said that. Now this is all I'm gonna say before I go to bed. See you in the morning tomorrow. ミラP 06:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request summarization
There are many words on this page, so let's return to essentials. As concisely as possible, please summarize what behavior led to your blocking and what you would do differently if unblocked. Thanks, -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 14:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm a little busy now, since I was in the middle of cleaning up Wikidata items, but it shouldn't take long. ミラP 14:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This is my behavior that led to my blocking:
 * My desire to become an admin led me to ask an admin to protect all those banned users' talk pages and to altering sock tags after being told not to add sock tags.
 * I also made several ill-conceived decisions at admin boards that wasted admins' time: a few BADNACs especially the NL19931993 incident, this, the Wintertree incident.
 * After the Ipswich MPs CFD, BHG told me reasons why constituency categorisation was a bad idea, but being overprotective of my creations at the time, I still thought it was a good idea at the time and made the categories anyway. When I was given the "How often is Gladstone referred to as the MP for Portarlington?" question, I wanted to win unfairly because I didn't want the constituency categories deleted: trying to bend the rules in my favor, doing some Google search in haste, resorting to posting to ANI. All this was a terrible mistake. If I had stopped earlier, stepped away, and allowed BHG to do the CFDs, I would never have been blocked from Wikipedia.
 * This is what I would do differently if unblocked.
 * I would, I reiterate, like to stick mostly to two things:
 * creating Wikipedia articles on Japan (including anime) and foreign politicians, and I intend to focus heavily on creating them and improving and updating similar existing articles.
 * nominating eligible articles for DYK (new/5x/GA within a week), and I would like to nominate a few other people's work for DYK.
 * Since I've been gaining experience with Peerage items, I would also like to consider removing/replacing Peerage sources here due to the deprecation.
 * I may vote at XFDs often, especially if I improve an AFD'd article, but following my reflections on my life, I would like to leave NACs and relists to people with the best experience.
 * I think this is what Bbb23 would call "things that editors without advanced permissions do".
 * I will no longer pursue adminship unless the time is right, but rather pursue content creation, and my "not an admin but might like to be one someday" UBX will be removed from my userpage.
 * Best, ミラP 02:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Best, ミラP 02:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Unblock work sheet notes

 * Please indicate your preference as to acceptance/declination. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 15:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Due to my response in the above section, I also suggest a TBAN from the WIkipedia and Wikipedia talk namespaces except for discussion related to editathons like WIR and article challenges or WP:ITN (I've submitted recent deaths there, though I'm not very good at non-death events). I'm also good with RS, so possibly add WP:RSN as an exemption? Also TBAN from all pages in the "user" namespace except my own or my ALTACCT. Mentorship not ruled out yet. Remember this page. ミラP 02:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I think the issues are all covered. Would like to hear from as a previous reviewing admin. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 11:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * You realize you are three months early on the Standard Offer? That might pose a problem for unblock, though if you continue as you have been lately another three months it will help your chances. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 11:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Just a reminder to "stay clear of BHG". Sometimes efforts to apologize just reopen old wounds and make things worse. I'd leave be. The best form of apology would be to avoid her and carry the lessons learned forward. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 11:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That's okay. I knew I was early, but I still realized that I was a prolific content creator and a regular at WIR and DYK before my block (as shown with the articles and DYKs I listed), and that I may have made my decision to agree to the standard offer three months ago in as much haste as when I filed that ill-conceived ANI report that led to my block; also you did say you were inclined to unblock. I've had a lot of positive contributions to Wikidata and Wikisource (in addition to enwiki) with relatively little incident there (compared to enwiki), and my ability to create articles had nothing to do with my block. The reason I suggested the T/IBan and the possibility of a PBlock or mentorship was because of the issues that led to my block, as I stated above.
 * As a compromise, I would at least like to suggest that should any T/IBan involving me be logged in this page, I should at least wait six months before appealing.
 * I also took some time to write my responses, rather than do it in haste. ミラP 02:11, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

I was hoping for something from Bbb23. I cannot unblock without him, and his silence implies opposition.02:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Based on what happened to him two months ago and this message here (especially the update), it seems unlikely we'll ever hear anything from Bbb23. I'm afraid this may be up to you. Remember what TonyBallioni said, use your judgment. I trust you with this decision because of your experience in unblock requests. ミラP 02:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That's confusing. He just growled at me last week. (sigh). -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 02:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * It has not been six months. The standard offer is six months.  I would suggest that this be declined, and the editor make another request after six months.  If you can't even bother to follow the guidance for the unblock process, how do we know that you will follow any other guidance?  The standard offer is not just some random essay that we throw at users.  It is a demonstration that you can follow simple, clear instructions.  Also, I find it a bit discouraging that Miraclepine is telling admins how to do their job here during this very unblock – for example, telling admins to log topic bans at WP:RESTRICT, as if admins are incompetent and need this user to guide them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * And there you have it. Please continue to edit constructively on other projects and please continue to to refrain from editing here. If you do these things and  wait until September 8, 2020 to  request unblocking, I'm sure your request will be received in a much better light. -- Deep fried okra  ( schalte ein ) 23:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I've read 's reply and pondered over it for a while, and I have realized that I had made this request early because of the COVID-19 pandemic in which places that would make it easy for me to Wikibreak were closed to stop the virus from spreading. The situation of the pandemic was uncertain at the time, so I decided to abort a wikibreak and make an attempt to return to Wikipedia. But so much time has passed since then that the situation is more certain than at the time, and all those places where I can go to stay away from the internet are starting to reopen, which may give me more time to wikibreak.
 * My thoughts are that admins are indeed competent and each has expertise in certain areas. That is why I trusted you with the unblock request: because of your long history of experience with them. That said, the reply has made me realise while having positive contributions to Wikipedia and its sister projects are important, so is displaying a willingness to follow the rules.
 * Therefore, I think it would be for the best of us that I withdraw this request and come back some day whenever the time is right... six months from today: 18 December 2020.
 * And besides, Wikidata is now my home wiki, and I've been having a lot of fun there.
 * Best, ミラP 23:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I wish everyone the best of luck here. ミラP 23:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request 3
I'm inclined to accept on account of the long amount of time that has passed since the last request and the block prior to that. However, since there's previously been extensive discussion I want to notify admins who previously considered the unblock requests,, ,. signed,Rosguill talk 05:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * OK. go on unblock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepfriedokra (talk • contribs)
 * As an uninvolved admin, I would concur and would be OK with an unblock. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Because Tony is the original blocking admin, I believe we should wait to see what he says. If Tony is okay with it, I have no objection.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * No opinion either way. If people are convinced by the appeal, feel free to unblock. Not a support, but not an objection either. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

"Wilfred Clarke" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wilfred_Clarke&redirect=no Wilfred Clarke] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Mari Shimizu
BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

I requested to create Reo Kurachi
Hi Miraclepine, I suggest to create Japanese voice actress Reo Kurachi, she has a behind voice of Raise A Suilen band member Reona Nyūbara from Anime: BanG Dream!

So would like to create this article and submit to did you know article for her?

Thanks.￼ Lovemuhcko (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I've had that particular person in mind for a while, but I'm busy with another draft right now, so I'll look at it tomorrow or day after. ミラP@Miraclepine 00:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm a little busy and I don't think I can finish this by day's end, but at least I was able to start a draft at Draft:Reo Kurachi with some to start with. Hopefully I can look at it tomorrow. ミラP@Miraclepine 03:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Now I created the article, and I'll DYK it as soon as I can. ミラP@Miraclepine 00:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Ruth Northway
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:YouTube controversies has been nominated for deletion
Category:YouTube controversies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. gnu 57 15:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC)