User talk:Mirandasquillace

Welcome!
Hello, Mirandasquillace, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Looking back to the oldest posts, I noticed that the edits were mostly additions to prior edits, while in the more recent edits, it is much more focused on the removal of "vandalism" on the topic.

I noticed that the comments on the talk pages were all civil and included constructive criticism. The people who edited the original post would ask to see if they had left out any information. On one of the talk pages, a person even posted a picture of a kitten saying "A kitten for you! Thanks for reviews my Wikipedia!".

Generally, the article seems to be of high quality. It is easy to read with obvious headings and few pictures that would distract from the information. There is a broad range of information on the subject. However, since there is so much information to cover, some sections are very short and limited.

I'm not an expert on each topic discussed in the article, so I wouldn't know if anything needed to be changed. I feel it is not my place to edit any information. If I did have background on the topic, I would add more specifics to the short sections, because I feel like there is a lot more information out there that could be contributed to themMirandasquillace (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Miranda- I agree the information and critiques in the Talk Page are very constructive. We are in agreement that the shorter sections of this article could use some elaboration but we can leave the specifics to the experts and add what we can about the physiology of honeybees.Abigail.langevin.uconn (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

does this work?
thanks for the critique! testing Mirandasquillace (talk) 15:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Randy, thanks for the evaluation of the honey bee article. I have assigned this article to you and Abby.  I don't know yet how you two plan to contribute separate content to the article and I would like you to figure that out.

Rico.schultz (talk) 18:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, Randy, please complete the training modules that were assigned last week! Rico.schultz (talk) 18:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)