User talk:Mirceaulinic

May 2019
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eden Hazard, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mirceaulinic


A tag has been placed on User:Mirceaulinic, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because I'm not linking to any company produce whatsoever, just linking to my personal blog. If that's still considered a violation, no issues from my side, but wanted to confirm. Thanks!

January 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Contested username block
In this case, I agree. I see why the block was made; your user page linked to your website. However, I believe the blocking admin did not realise this is just your real name (rather than, say, a company). Furthermore, your website appears to be non-commercial (but note, I use an ad blocker), set up to freely share interesting technical information with the world, and you do not appear to have been linking to it inappropriately. I understand why the block was made but I believe it was a mistake in this case. 331dot, as the blocking admin, what are your thoughts? --Yamla (talk) 12:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)