User talk:Mireska

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Engivuk! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Nmate (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Kassa
Hello Mireska,

I deleted your contributions at Kassa on the ground that your addition there does not look to me notable enough to being mentioned in the article. But if you want to create an own article about Richard Raši then of course your addition may be important there.--Nmate (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I need to create article about Richard Rasi
I don't understand why my contribution was deleted. Anyway I added a new contribution again, as I need it to do for my University Course. Please let me know if there is anything wrong or what I should change.

Thank you, Mireska (talk) 12:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * For me, your previous contribution to the article was OK, but your current one gives too much irrelevant detail. There are many Wikipedia policies and learning them all takes time - a lot of time - and someone may produce one that says that current mayors shouldn't be added to articles. I can't see any justification (on the evidence shown) for a separate article on Raši, it's better to refer to him as that, rather than Richard, by the way. I'll leave the helpme up as someone else might have different ideas. By the way, doing something "for my University Course" is OK so long as it fits Wikipedia policies and procedures. Anything that doesn't has to go, no matter why it's been put there. Peridon (talk) 12:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I have to  agree with Peridon. However, don't  get  disappointed, find another subject  to  write about, and prepare it  in  your user space first. Don't  hesitate to  ask  me for advice on  my  talk  page. --Kudpung (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * To put it simply: The article wasn't the place to discuss in detail the achievements of the current mayor who is at best, temporary. It adds undue weight to the subject and it also seems promotional which is strictly forbidden in Wikipedia. I had to revert roughly half of your text, but retaining mention of him as the current mayor, (which is acceptable as they are things pertinent to the subject). And yes, don't get discouraged. It really is nothing personal, just that we all have to follow policy. And yes, you can always ask for advice from us if needed.


 * As for creating a standalone article on Richard Rasi, you also have to again follow the guidelines. The most important one being that of proving notability. You already seem to know about verifiablity so instead I'll give you the following links to policies that might help:


 * He must meet at least one of the criteria in:
 * WP:POLITICIAN or
 * Notability (people)


 * You must follow the following policies given what you have divulged:
 * Biographies of living persons
 * Neutral point of view
 * Conflict of interest
 * WP:42


 * Again, if the subject simply can not meet the criteria, it may be better to look for another topic. Good luck. - Obsidi ♠ n Soul  13:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)