User talk:Miriska

January 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. JeanColumbia (talk) 15:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I was not experimenting but i was begining, you're true. I'me sorry for the changes i made on Barbra Streisand.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to King Arthur. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoy gabs adds 15:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I disagree you, my changes on King Arthur were not so bad...

George Clooney article
I undid your entry into the article. That quote was unreferenced, if it was even valid, and did not fit in with the article. No hard feelings, but I don't think that belonged in the article. --MrShamrock (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I know i lost the references and the quote had not so much to do with this article but it's a true one, and so interesting when you love George....

Speedy deletion nomination of Volgoprombank
A tag has been placed on Volgoprombank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 14:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack loach
A tag has been placed on Jack loach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 14:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)