User talk:Mirv/archive 2

Hi, I deleted User:Mirv/Cosmotheism. It's linked to from Pages needing attention and Talk:Cosmotheism/Archive 2 though so you might want to change those links, or remove them as they no longer apply. Angela. 22:33, Jan 30, 2004 (UTC)

I'll scope out the Lord Ken thing, but I'm not sanguine. I have the impression he thinks he knows everything already and that mere facts and logic are unlikely to make an impression. Gene Ward Smith 23:32, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Request for hard ban on Lord_Kenneth
User:Lord_Kenneth in talk mentions quote you're full of **** all...  here unquote. Unworthy for lordship, methinks : ) Sincerely, irismeister 13:43, 2004 Feb 3 (UTC)

I have finished the first draft of the Saudi peace plan/initiative which I chose because it has been ignored in Wikipedia. The HTML comments contain the page outline that I will be using to create all the pages. More to come. OneVoice 16:19, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Request for Comment
Requests for comment/Homegrown images - UtherSRG 16:25, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

mirv est homo impartialis et amicus humani generis -- aut non?
Mirv, mirv, quid est tuum problema? Quare persequeris me et affligis me in Votis pro Deletione? Quo modo te offensi aut vulneravi? Quia loqueris Latine, tu es meus solus amicus in Wikipedia. Nunc necessito tuum auxilium valde et statim.


 * Translation: Mirv, mirv, what's your problem? Why do you persecute and attack me on Votes for deletion? How have I offended or injured you? Because you speak Latin, you are my only friend in Wikipedia. Now I really need your help, and right now. [I'm far from the only Latin speaker here in Wikipedia; there are others who are far better at it than I am.]

Mea nemesis et accusator est unus Psychonauta, qui propter insaniem et invidiam vult destruere et delere omnes meas contributiones in hoc mirabile loco -- Wikipedia.


 * My nemesis and accuser is one Psychonaut, who because of his insanity and envy wishes to destroy and delete all my contributions in this marvelous place -- Wikipedia.

Psychonauta denigrat et deridet me ad libitum; id es ejus problema (et patiatur Psychonauta semper et sine pausa in Gehenna pro peccatis et criminibus ejus :-); tu autem es homo superior et non proclivus ad stupiditatem (sicut, eheu, Psychonauta).


 * Psychonaut denigrates and attacks me freely; you have the same problem (and Psychonaut ought to suffer in Hell, forever and without pause, for his sins and crimes :-); you, however, are a superior man and not inclined towards stupidity (as, alas, Psychonaut is).

Tu enim nescis historiam (vide infra) ejus mecum conflictus!


 * You don't know the history (see below) of his conflicts with me!

Tuum curriculum vitae indicat te esse hominem sapientem et amatorem veritatis.


 * Your curriculum vitae indicates you to be a wise man and a lover of truth.

Nonne tibi apparet Psychonauta esse non compos mentis et disturbatus (si licet mihi amabiliter facere jocos) in mente sua?


 * Doesn't Psychonaut appear to you to be non compos mentis and disturbed (if you will allow me to make a loving joke) in his mind?

Psychonautae contra me aggressio est sine merito et non justificata.


 * Psychonaut's attack on me is without merit and unjustified.

Quare concurris cum ejus opinionibus falsis et ad hominem?


 * Why do you agree with his false opinions and ad hominem?

Nunc volo te audire alteram partem et non praejudicare veritatem.


 * Now I want you to hear the other part and not to prejudge truth.

Nonne habes sensum justitiae et intellectualis curiositatis?


 * Don't you have a sense of justice and intellectual curiosity?

Considera hanc possibilitem. Mentifex est independens cogitator et vult contribuere suas theorias de evolutione humanae mentis et de constructione novae formae mentis. Quare non recipit Wikipedia novas ideas? Quisque suos patimur Manes, sed quare patitur Mentifex rejectionem et deletionem in Wikipedia? Ubi est amor veritatis? Ubi est auxilium pro novis usoribus et personis volentibus participere in Wikipedia? Et tu, Carole? Esne tu censor et rejector novarum idearum? Fer auxilim, non odium. Expectamus meliora de te.


 * Consider this possibility. Mentifex is an independent thinker and wishes to contribute his theories on the evolution of the human mind and the construction of new forms of mind. Why does Wikipedia not receive new ideas? Each one endures his own Manes [is that right?], but why does Mentifex suffer rejection and deletion in Wikipedia? Where is the love of truth? Where is the help for new users and people wishing to participate in Wikipedia? And you, Charles? Surely you are not a censor and a rejector of new ideas? Bring help, not hate. We expect better from you.

Externales Nexus Importantes In Hac Re

 * External links important in this matter


 * Mentifex ut videt eum Doctor Philosophiae Ben Goertzel (AI investigator admiratus et importans)
 * Quando Mirv Erat Puer et Educabatur Domi in Lingua Latina
 * Psychonauta in Flagrante Delicto
 * Mentifex Omnia
 * Wikipedia Mentifex Controversia Est Infra Dignitatem

The above flattery of me and attacks on Psychonaut aside, Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research. My education and my facility with Latin are not relevant to this issue. --No-One Jones (talk) 19:47, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

If facility with Latin is the only criterion for being Arthur's friend, then he should be thanking me for opposing his vanity articles. Not that I'd consider myself fluent, but why would he assume that someone with a graduate education in linguistics would be ignorant of the classical languages? &lt;rolls eyes&gt; &mdash;Psychonaut 09:56, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I would like to formally invite you to join others at Wikiproject_Arab-Israeli_conflict to work with us toward resolving issues that have arisen and resulted in edit wars here at Wikipedia. Also, I would like to formally request that you agree, along with the rest of us, to refrain from editting each of the articles that are listed as currently under protection or subject to edit wars on that page till the issues regarding that particular article have been resolved and we have removed that article from the currently under protection or subject to edit wars list. OneVoice 15:52, 11 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thank you, I was not aware that User:Viajero has sysop privileges. I will have to thank him to unprotecting the page. OneVoice 19:11, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hmmmm...I forgot to mention "Palestinian boy" stating instead "boy"...the fact that a 12-year old child was shot is more important to me than whether he was Palestinian, Israeli or some other group and so I left out the identifier that divides people leaving the information that unites all parents..."a 12-year old boy was shot". OneVoice 20:07, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. --Ed Senft! 23:40, 14 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Why did you name yourself Mirv?
Why did you name yourself Mirv? --Ed Senft! 03:35, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Because someone on IRC suggested that I do. --Ed Senft! 03:39, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind encouragement on my photos. Pollinator 07:44, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)

A note from someone who once dared edit the Race article ;-)
P0M 16:14, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC): Yikes! Sorry, it was user 195.... who has reopened the edit war, and you've been trying to put a stop to it. 195 has already come to the attention of others as a vandal and has been threatened with banning. Sorry for putting you in his company, if only temporarily.

(Comments from Vogel, which had absolutely nothing to do with the above message, and contained a number of personal attacks, removed.)

168
Hi, you voted on the issue of whether 168... should be desysoped. Following this, he was temporarily desysopped. Please participate in the new vote as to whether that temporary desysopping should now be reversed until the committees can deal with it properly. Thank you. Angela. 00:45, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)

You need to go to the page and vote regarding the changes some are trying to make there.