User talk:Misantropo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Afd etiquette

 * Please don't blank Hector Acuña. If the outcome of the AFD debate is to delete it, it'll be removed. Meanwhile, leave the entry (you can edit it if you want) but don't blank it and don't remove the AFD notice. -- (drini's page| &#x260E; ) 19:18, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Colegio Franklin Delano Roosevelt, The American School of Lima
"If you are not famous you can still have a page about you" - that's true, but that's called a userpage. And the difference between a userpage and a Wikipedia article is that WP articles are encyclopedic and don't have links to editors, Wikipedia namespace pages etc., whereas user pages are about editors and how they work on WP. So basically, as User:Misantropo is about the Wikipedia editor, and Álvaro Proaño is about the founder of the TSA, linking the founder of the TSA is justified whereas linking the WP editor is not. If you're notable, sooner or later you'll have an article under Álvaro Proaño and in that case my revision is better, and if you're not notable then you shouldn't link yourself from WP articles. Regards, Zoz (t) 18:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Do the Bartman
I have replied at the above talk page. I hope it answers your question. Cheers.  young  american (ahoy-hoy) 20:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Rate equation
It seems to me that your correction to rate equation (the derivative) was wrong as it was perfectly OK Knights who say ni 23:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Roosevelt peru picnic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roosevelt peru picnic.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok  ☠  02:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject Peru
Hi, you might be interested in joining WikiProject Peru, we help expand Peru-related articles and take care of the Portal:Peru. Talk there, thanks. -- Walt e r Humala God   save him! (wanna Talk?) 15:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Misantropo, the article TSA Peru has been deleted. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-26 08:13Z 

New Ivy League
A "" template has been added to the article New Ivy League, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Were you aware of the previous article at New Ivies? This is technically a speedy-deletion candidate since it is a re-creation of a previously deleted article. -- Rbellin|Talk 21:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of New Ivy League
I've nominated New Ivy League, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that New Ivy League satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/New Ivy League and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of New Ivy League during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cornell Rockey 04:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Roosevelt.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Roosevelt.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Upch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Upch.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Roosevelt.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Roosevelt.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Upch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Upch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)