User talk:Misessus

Don't use WP
Civility or the lack thereof isn't the problem with WP, nor the supposed lack of collaboration. The problem is its explicit goals of distortion and blocking of useful, valuable information on whatever subject considered fringe, and the promotion and protection of uneducated, biased editors.

WP could be a great place for information, but as we all know, it makes every effort to make sure that never happens. The main purpose of most editors, in fact, is to make sure that WP is as distorted and unreliable as possible, so much so that they themselves feel compelled to advice against even looking up anything on WP.

I make sure to point this fact out whenever I'm in a debate. As I have first hand knowledge of the editing process and its goals, I try my best to get people to shun WP. I find it interesting how so many put so much time on editing an "encyclopedia" they themselves wouldn't even recommend to their worst enemies.

And by the way, did I say anything to or about BigK that wasn't true? We all know that what I said was 100% true. Oh but wait, I forgot that truth has no place in WP :D Misessus (talk) 19:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)