User talk:Misha19999

Vandalism
You cannot add references to public figures that are not about them. That is considered vandalism Chandrika2035 (talk) 10:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The article is clearly about Zinnia, it even has her photos. You are presenting false information. Misha19999 (talk) 10:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The article you have referenced describes a Ms Janif however, the public figure you are editing is Ms Kumar. I have reason to suspect you are a sockpuppet of 220.233.36.63 and 220.233.36.64. Chandrika2035 (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * If you Google Zinnia Janif Kumar, you will see the same person as Zinnia Kumar in the photos & in the articles in the public domain. Unless you are blind or knowingly misleading the public.
 * Why are you purposefully presenting false information? Misha19999 (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Wiki is about presenting truthful information especially about public figures. Misha19999 (talk) 10:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I also do not appreciate your personal attack of 'presenting false information' after I mentioned your reference to Ms Janif not being of the public figure Zinnia Kumar in question. All of my references clearly state the name and age of the wiki I edited and are from the last 5 years. Chandrika2035 (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * So Zinnia Janif Kumar who looks exactly like Zinnia Kumar, who was born in Sydney (just like her), the same education, background & everything else is not the “same person.” Sorry to say you’re purposefully presenting false information to the public for the past few years. Something as simple as her age has continually changed in the 5 years, she is magically growing younger according to you.
 * This begs the question what’s else on her page is untrue/ incorrect. Misha19999 (talk) 10:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * False information threat again. Please provide the article for your claim and I will happily update the information, as of now I can only see a Zinnia Janif who works at Clean Slate films also in Sydney and is not the public figure in question. Chandrika2035 (talk) 11:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The false information is a fact,
 * Zinnia Kumar has been known via various alias, Zinnia Janif, Zinnia Jothi Janif & now Zinnia Kumar. You can Google this for your research & easily find all information about her, especially in the images section.
 * Few articles are below:
 * https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/south-west/science-researcher-zinnia-janif-is-setting-her-sights-on-the-miss-world-australia-crown/news-story/b8b87f69df686c816b3245e243f926bb
 * https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/south-west/hinchinbrook-resident-zinnia-janif-has-overcome-her-social-phobia-to-transform-from-a-nerd-into-a-beauty-queen/news-story/93e2d38044b57ea03a7fed93b5fb410a
 * https://issuu.com/indianlink/docs/2013-05_sydney_1_/s/20823384 Misha19999 (talk) 11:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * None of your articles mention Zinnia Kumar. This cannot be used as evidence. Chandrika2035 (talk) 11:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Zinnia Janif is the same person as Zinnia Kumar (it’s clear evidence from the articles & the images), changing your last name doesn’t void your true identity nor denial of it. Especially when your face & background matches exactly.
 * I’ll appeal to wiki regarding this as I tried my best to present the true information to you, but Zinnia & her team are purposefully propagating false information, despite there being clear evidence.
 * As something as simple as age is being falsified here, it once again begs question what else information is untrue on the page. It should be investigated. Misha19999 (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Let me know how that goes. 2 of of the articles you provided are degraded as they are 10 years old and contain no images or explicit use of 'Zinnia Kumar'. The third article is an unreliable source. Chandrika2035 (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I’m sure the images relating the articles are very much available on Google search.
 * Your denial of the picture of her with the other pageant members where her name is clearly printed is “unreliable source” is unfortunate.
 * Of course there is the High School year book as physical evidence as well, where she claimed to be a DUX, which can be easily identified.
 * But I’ll present my case regarding & correct the misinformation spread regarding this “public figure.” Misha19999 (talk) 12:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Not my opinion. All considered unreliable sources as per wiki 'reliable source guidelines' WP:RS. Envy is not a primary source wiki recognises. Chandrika2035 (talk) 05:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Unnecessary attack, very unprofessional. But there are plenty of sources of online identifying her real age & name, including her high school year book, which clearly shows she was not the DUX in year 12, which she claimed. Once again misrepresentation & false information. Misha19999 (talk) 10:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I just realized you were referring to the claim that have been submitted in regard to the inaccuracies of DOB & other achievements over the years.  Wiki team did come stated that current these details are not on the page (as they have been removed) therefore can’t be investigated. That was the outcome. Misha19999 (talk) 15:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * lol ok Chandrika2035 (talk) 09:50, 30 June 2024 (UTC)