User talk:Misibacsi

Ilka Palmay
Hi. I see that you can translate Hungarian. I wrote up an article for Palmay, but many of the weblinks for her are in Hungarian. Could you please take a look at http://www.szineszkonyvtar.hu/contents/p-z/palmayelet.htm and http://www.sosantikvarium.hu/kezirat46.html and let me know if I missed anything notable (or just add it to the article)?

Thanks for any help! -- Ssilvers 19:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much. I have now tried to fix the name order in Ilka Palmay.   Would you kindly take another quick look and see if I have done it correctly?  Thanks for your help!  Best regards, -- Ssilvers 13:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for making the corrections. Best wishes! -- Ssilvers 19:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Komondor
Now do you think this dog is a representative Komondor? This kid have seen this picture on Westminster Dog Show article on Wikipedia and now he is editwarring that the Komondors are small dogs and this picture is absolutely correct, just because this animal has been shown at the Westminster Dog Show, and that means that this can not be wrong. First I thougt this dog was a Puli. I was arguing miles about this stupid picture on that talk page, that it is misrepresenting the Komondor breed, and gives the wrong idea about the breed, and indeed it does. I was trying to put a remark in the picture that this is a small dog but he constantly reverts it. And keers adding Komondorok.

Warrington (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Now the kid goes and makes adits like this: (I copied his last version:)

Appearance, Size, and Proportions
The Komondors appearance is dignified and commands respect, people unfamiliar with the breed are often surprised by how quick and agile the dogs are.

The AKC Breed Standard states the following for size, weight and proportions of the Komondor:

''Males 27½ inches and up at the withers; Females 25½ inches and up at the withers. Males are approximately 100 pounds and up, Females, approximately 80 pounds and up at maturity, with plenty of bone and substance. While large size is important, type, character, symmetry, movement and ruggedness are of the greatest importance and are on no account to be sacrificed for size alone. The body is slightly longer than the height at the withers. Height below the minimum is a fault.''

The Fédération Cynologique Internationale Hungarian Standard states the following for size weight and proportions of the Komondor:

IMPORTANT PROPORTIONS

•	The body length sligthly exceeds the height at the withers.

•	The deepest point of the brisket is approximately on a level with half of the height at the withers.

•	The muzzle is slightly shorter than half of the length of the head.

HEIGHT AT WITHERS

Males:	Minimum 70 cm. 

Females: Minimum 65 cm.

WEIGHT

Males:	50 – 60 kg. 

Females: 40 – 50 kg.

The breed shows few faults in type and is largely uniform as it has always been bred with the same target.

Who cares about the American standard? This is a Hungarian dog, and it is also as I found out a Hungarian national tresure, what adoes it matter what the Acf says. It shoul not be put there as a first referrence, and the edits are lousy, and he probably have never seen a Komondor all his life.

Warrington (talk) 13:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Kapteyn b
Hi,

Thanks for helping out a few days ago with the Kapteyn b article. Do you know where some good artists illustrations might be found for the article (Copyright-free, of course). I can't seem to find any.

Also a good astronomers photo of the parent star might be a good addition as well (if one can be found).

Thanks!

Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 07:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

I found this site, which has many pictures on this topic, and "The Planetary Habitability Laboratory Website Content by The Planetary Habitability Laboratory @ UPR Arecibo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License."

http://phl.upr.edu/press-releases/kapteyn. Misibacsi (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I will look into it. Many thanks! :-)


 * Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 23:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Misibacsi!


Happy New Year! Misibacsi, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Hafspajen (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Hoho`
Helló Misbácsi. Azt a cikket még meg kellene csináljuk. Zubaran. Hafspajen (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Erre gondolsz? hu:Szerkesztő:Hafspajen/Francisco de Zurbarán Sajnos első látásra túl sok a kép, ezekből el kellene hagynod néhányat. Különben mások fognak törölni belőle. Gondolom még a szöveget bővíteni akarod. Szólj, hogy miben tudok segíteni. Misibacsi (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Egen mindig sok a kép. De azt leveni nen nehéz. A baj a szöveg. Hafspajen (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Mi a baj a szöveggel? A mostani nem jó, vagy bővíteni kellene és nincs több forrás? Hiányzik valami a cikkből? Misibacsi (talk) 19:18, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hát hogy angolul van.... Hafspajen (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Mindketten tudunk angolul. Ha le kell fordítani egy angol szöveget, bizonyára elboldogulunk vele. Mi a probléma konkrétan? A szócikkben nem látok angol szöveget, csak 1-2 szót kérdeztél. Misibacsi (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Jo, mindketten tudunhk ,-ANGOLUL. Magyar -az a más. Hafspajen (talk) 10:26, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Can you help verify translations of articles from
Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from to English Wikipedia? This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great.

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates Pass and Fail may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Translation
Hello! Strange request here, but an article about me and my Wikipedia work has been promoted to Good article status at English Wikipedia and nominated for similar status at Spanish Wikipedia. I'm curious if you have any interest in translating the entry for Hungarian Wikipedia or other projects?

Figured I'd ask since your profile suggests you do translation work. Either way, happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)