User talk:MisprisionofTreason

September 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. – túrian  patois  04:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Sept 11 Arbcom
RxS (talk) 04:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. – túrian  patois  04:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – túrian  patois  11:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah...
I never said they were wrong, I just said it was inappropriate for the place. The were just calling a spade a spade. – túrian  patois  18:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Spade is a spade indeed, speaking of appropriate, did you know that when people feel the need to piss, they usually do it in their own yard? It is the very basic of common decency and etiquette. Then again, there are all sorts of people. Go figure, eh? MisprisionofTreason (talk) 22:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I fail to see your point... – túrian  patois  00:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You fail to see why these 'well intended' warnings are misplaced? Has it occur to you that it's far easier to impose the block if the 'off topic' administrator sees the talk page filled with 'signs of misconduct'. Do you think that such tactic is used often? Does Wikipedia have a name for such tactics?


 * Why don't you take a sober look at the remarkably frequent, blatant and unrestrained defamation spread by your fellow editors, go to their talk pages and you may see the point. Would you like to continue this conversation about 'vandals, loons, nuts and trolls' out there? MisprisionofTreason (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Others will worry about them. But this ridiculous agenda you seem to be pushing (since the onyl edits you have are on that page) is getting old. Either be productive and stop creating unnecessary conflict, or edit another article. – túrian  patois  00:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Productive? Agenda? Edit conflict? Brother, I've just asked you not to engage in such... why don't you provide some references for each claim you've made. MisprisionofTreason (talk) 01:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Try the entire September 11th talk page. – túrian  patois  01:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You try it, you're the one who's alleging misconduct. Is opening discussion about 'new investigation' some sort of 'ridiculous agenda pushing, edit conflicting, unproductive' engagement? MisprisionofTreason (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313667793

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313732004

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313732420

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313734202

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313738080

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313741752

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313821119

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:September_11_attacks&diff=prev&oldid=313982012

Want more? I am basically saying that another policy violation and I will report your behavior and request a check user. – túrian  patois  01:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've checked your link-spam, I see nothing but references, opinions and questions on the page that serves for that very same purpose. To which of those do you object, and which one are violating our policies? Remember the note about etiquette? I wonder when you'll see that point? MisprisionofTreason (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That same attitude right there. Wikipedia is NOT a forum nor is it a medium to "prove" something to other editors." Asking why people are there is incivil. So you have made defamatory remarks and used it as a forum despite multiple warnings. – túrian  patois  01:31, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I've asked the editors how is it possible that person has to create an account to provide dozens of down to earth mainstream links, while the editors who state they are 'working hard' on the article, do nothing but play with, I'm bored to hell with them, 'conspiracy theories'. At the time of memorial! So you see, it was not about 'proving things', it was very clear, I'd even say serious question. That said, you've invited yourself here, you are running amok on my talk page, you keep spreading unfounded accusation you fail to substantiate, and you are lecturing me about the attitude while issuing warnings like we are in some 'rabbit hole'????!!! Perhaps you need to cool down a bit? MisprisionofTreason (talk) 01:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I take a WP:DGAF mentality. I just do what is right. – túrian  patois  01:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * It's ok, just try to avoid those 'Bad ways to not give a...' MisprisionofTreason (talk) 02:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Appeal
Lol, no brother, you can't handle the facts. Well that's a wrap up, bye! MisprisionofTreason (talk) 14:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)