User talk:Miss.julia.goolia

Laundry ball
Why did you remove all that text from the article? The statements from FTC, Australian Consumers' Association and Altroconsumo should be notable enough to ve in the article. And you also changed some facts, the source says that the ball is claimed to contain "activated water", not that the ceramic pieces activate the water.

One thing, the lead is supposed to be a stand-alone summary of the article. Some facts will be cited twice, once in the lead, in a summarized way, and again in the body, in a long detailed way. --Enric Naval (talk) 01:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)