User talk:MissBryan

Further information and links on admistrative abuse
"Please keep an eye on this user User talk:2Cold06, who was created about the same time as GrandWizard in October 2006 and basically unused until now, since McGrandWizard is blocked. He has one edit to the Alpha Phi Alpha article, and today posted a request on the talk page for help on an article for C.C. Poindexter. Mr. Poindexter was never a member the actual fraternity and although he participated in early formation, he was not given a founder status. I feel the only reason this user wants Poindexter's article and the others he mentions is similar to the article on Sigma Pi Phi and the deleted article Alpha Kappa Nu; to disparage Alpha Phi Alpha, but I can't think of any Alpha who would want to devote time to persons that the fraternity doesn't venerate. Thanks--Ccson 04:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)" I caught that one edit earlier. I'll keep an eye on him, but let me know if he picks up where MKF last left off. Thanks. | Mr. Darcy talk 04:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC) This user User talk:CarmenBryan has made an opinion to the AFD for C.C. Poindexter after only joining wikipedia on Jan 7, 2007. The user just happens to have a copy of the book that MyKungFu references to refute my dates. This can only be another sockpuppet of Mykungfu. I dissatisified that he's trying to rig the AFD request and once again not acting in good faith.--Ccson 05:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC) " at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MrDarcy#MyKungFu

and

"Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles C. Poindexter Have a look. I believe that 2Cold06 is playing fast and loose with sources, but you're far more familiar with the subject matter. | Mr. Darcy talk 20:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC) I think I was mistaken about Poindexter's notability. If I close the AfD early (as keep), do you think that you (or others) can make the article a legitimate stand-alone entry, rather than just a POV fork from Alpha Phi Alpha? I'm just not familiar enough with the subject matter to handle the content. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:42, 8 January 2007 (UTC)" at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ccson#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FCharles_C._Poindexter

I'm going to assume that forming an AFD and recruiting someone to argue its points is questionable for an administrator. I am also going to assume that blocking someone with no basis if they reitterate a point that was already stated about the obvious bias of an AFD is admistrative abuse. CarmenBryan 17:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)