User talk:MissHollyoaks

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Mariah Fredericks has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ジャム] [ t -  c  ] 21:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ジャム] [ t -  c  ] 21:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meadow Jones
A tag has been placed on Meadow Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I dream of horses (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for adding the template, but please only use it once per page.  Cheers!  Cycle~ (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Repost of New pages
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 10:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

All Saints' Church, Childwall
Your recent edit has been moved to the talk page because there are some issues which need to be sorted out. The lead is not an appropriate place for it; maybe a new section at the end entitled, say, "Present use" or "Present day". And the citation has to be to the precise page of the Hollyoaks website which contains the information; just a link to the home page is of no value to the article. Useful advice on citation can be found here. It can be hard work sometimes to do this properly, but it then makes the edit much more useful to the reader. Good luck with future editing; it can be difficult to do it well, but it's worth it if you do. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Invite
Hey, myself and User:Raintheone have decided to consider a creation of a Wikiproject for Hollyoaks, mainly to improve articles to a higher standard. I just thought I would ask if you would consider joining, if you don't that's fine but I just thought I would ask. If you do decide to, then please add your username to the 'support' section on WikiProject Council/Proposals/Hollyoaks. Thanks :)  Who niverse 93  talk?  15:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)