User talk:Miss Glamorous

I love you
 '''hello Watch Yo Face,

A red rose to someone who is in my heart.

 --'--,--@ the guy in n° 189.4.30.29 (talk) 02:17, 5 November 2011 (UTC)'

Watch Yo Face → Miss Glamorous

 * Datestamp: 01:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Reason: I don't really like my user name Watch Yo Face (talk) 01:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rosa Mendes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Raw, Intoxicated and Need for Speed: Most Wanted (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See bang}} m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220  of  Borg 08:37, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TenillieDashwoodMatch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TenillieDashwoodMatch.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.pingram.me/tag/womenswrestling. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:TenillieDashwoodMatch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TenillieDashwoodMatch.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kelly Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to ODB


 * Michelle McCool (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to John Morrison

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Kanellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Beautiful People (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

 * Not to put to fine a point on it, but it seems pretty clear at this point that on addition to block evasion you lack the required level of competence to be a productive editor of Wikipedia, as evidenced by the fact that you continued with the exact same problematic behavior that led to your other account being blocked. I suggest you find some other way to spend your time. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC

If I don't get unblocked give Ribbon Salminen this source http://www.lethalwow.com/bios/taryn-terrell.php for Taryn Terrell


 * That's just perfect. I am not a WP:CHECKUSER, so I didn't know you were using the same IP until you said so just now. The block is based on an application of the duck test, and this latest remark does nothing whatsoever to sway from the opinion that you are in fact the same user. Any reviewing admin is free to contact me for the details of how I came to that conclusion if they don't see it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maryse Ouellet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan O’Reilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TnT (professional wrestling)


The article TnT (professional wrestling) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Individuals are notable, but notability is not inherited. All sources are WP:ROUTINE match results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   19:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of TnT (professional wrestling) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TnT (professional wrestling) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/TnT (professional wrestling) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nikki ♥  311   05:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)