User talk:Missashmarie7

Nomination of Xpressdocs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xpressdocs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Xpressdocs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xpressdocs


A tag has been placed on Xpressdocs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Largoplazo (talk) 15:35, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I see no evidence that the company has become notable in the six weeks since the article was last deleted, and the sources in the article are still all press releases or otherwise affiliated, or mere mentions in routine who's-buying-whom articles, which are generally press releases or pretty close to it. Largoplazo (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)