User talk:Missdsr

January 2008

 * 1) Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary.  Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits.  Mike Doughney (talk) 06:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Mike Doughney (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Paul Cain
Please note that Paul Cain's "A Letter of Confession" was the subject of an article in the March 2005 Charisma Magazine and there is no evidence that the magazine has retracted or corrected this story. While your assertion that his 'confession' is false may perhaps be the subject of current rumor, editors of Wikipedia articles, particularly those about living persons, must rely on published articles as sources, particularly when reporting on contentious or controversial matters. This also holds true when removing material which is supported by such citations; removal of material supported by published citations without some valid reason for doing so is not permitted. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's official policies and guidelines, perhaps starting with the 5 Pillars of Wikipedia, before making further edits. Thank you. Mike Doughney (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)