User talk:Missfrance2016

August 2016
Thanks for the information, but I'm simply cleaning up the article as per what is said in the listed sources. Thank you!


 * I would suggest that you open a discussion on the talkpage of the article before you make any more edits to the article. It looks as if your edits are contentious and it is disruptive to keep editing the article without dicussion especially when you meet opposition. Dr.   K.  05:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello again! My edits are not contentious. The last one, for example, states that Tara Teng did not place at any major events at Miss World. She was also not a quarter-finalist. These edits are not contentious, they are reported facts. I would appreciate if you would avoid editing my revisions as you are biasing the article. Thank you!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tara Teng. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr.  K.  05:23, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I can't comment on most of your edits, but reverting me was definitely contentious as established by you being quickly reverted back. Being "fair and unbiased" doesn't mean you're allow to re-introduce WP:BLP violations. Actually being fair and unbiased means we should remove all BLP violations. I specifically noted the significant problems with the sourcing in my edit summary and since you reverted me you should have seen my edit summary. I didn't specifically mention BLP, but the sourcing there was so clearly deficient it wouldn't really be acceptable in any article and you did not improve the sourcing, at all at least when you reverted me or soon after (instead getting in to a minor revert war with another editor). If you're not aware of our sourcing standards for general articles you frankly shouldn't be editing a BLP at all and definitely shouldn't be dealing with anything potentially controversial on BLPs. I already linked to WP:Syn which is part of WP:OR, I suggest you take a read of WP:RS too. Nil Einne (talk) 11:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Trinity Western University people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Some possibly useful references
You also may find there are some specific rules in the Manual of Style, in particular, that apply to certain situations. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages (but not article edits) by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions or ask your question on this page and then place Help me before the question. I hope this is not too late to help you and that you will not be discouraged when you learn more about Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia; and Contributing to Wikipedia; and Wikipedia tutorial; and Getting started
 * Avoiding common mistakes; and How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified ruleset; and Simplified Manual of Style; and Manual of Style
 * List of policies; and List of guidelines
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia; and What Wikipedia is not; and Words to watch and Manual of Style/Words to watch
 * Identifying reliable sources; and Verifiability; and No original research; and Neutral point of view
 * How to copy-edit; and How to create your first article
 * Help:Referencing for beginners; and Help:Footnotes
 * Help:Introduction to talk pages; and Help:Using talk pages; and Talk page guidelines
 * Copyright Problems; and Copyright violations; and Images; and Image use policy
 * Help:Contents and Questions provide guidance and links to pages where help can be requested. Also see Teahouse.

This is great, thank you Jim!