User talk:Missionary Muslim

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zidane Hamid


A tag has been placed on Draft:Zidane Hamid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. bonadea contributions talk 14:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Zidane Hamid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zidane Hamid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zidane Hamid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 04:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

the subject of article is notable for wikipedia because of many distinctions. i want to get suggestions for its improvement so that it could remain part of wikipedia Missionary Muslim (talk) 08:23, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Zidane Hamid. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:54, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

I am new on wikipedia. I want to have guidence about where the points in Zidane Hamid article which have promotional language. thanks Missionary Muslim (talk) 09:58, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Zidane Hamid, you may be blocked from editing. ''
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Stop restoring the promotional and badly sourced content to the article. If you do not understand why your additions are reverted, please go to the article's talk page and ask, and don't restore the text. Wikipedia is not a place to promote people. bonadea'' contributions talk 10:06, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Zidane Hamid. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 10:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Zidane Hamid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS (talk |c|em ) 10:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

I want suggestions how to make this article acceptable for wikipedia Missionary Muslim (talk) 12:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC) Missionary Muslim (talk) 10:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Some suggestions/requests have been posted in response to your question on the article's talk page. Please note that it is still far from certain that the article will be kept; the discussion is still ongoing. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 14:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)