User talk:Missnohmaar

Welcome!
Hello, Missnohmaar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! --Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2014
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically File:Pendragon boxed set.jpg, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. See WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from File:Pendragon boxed set.jpg with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry
I wanted to apologize. I thought at first that you made an nonconstructive edit, but it seems to not be after all. Why don't you consider creating your user-page to prevent suspicion? Red links on usernames often suggest vandalism. Abel Lawrence (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of R.R. Turock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R.R. Turock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/R.R. Turock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)