User talk:Misspaulinac/The Rebuild Foundation/Jchoi209 Peer Review

1. The article does a really good job of going in depth with the different projects of this organization and sets a clear understanding on what the organization does.

2. It was nice to see the different sections of programs and awards that were related to the different housing projects.

3. The group should add the different politics that are related to the organization and research different points of views that people have towards this organization.

These changes would be good because they would improve a non-bias representation of the organization.

4. I think that the most important improvement needed in the article is adding citations to all of the literature. There are many times that the literature doesn't have a source attached to it.

5. I noticed there were a lot of hyperlinks that were linked to other wikipedia pages and I think that my group and I can apply that for our own edits!

Jchoi209 (talk) 03:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)