User talk:Missy-Squishy 24/H’s LGBTQ+ Latina/o/x/e health communication, trans affirming health communication, and LGBTQ+ student organizing

A's Peer Review of H
As for relevance, the sandbox draft does a great job of staying on topic and discussing important features on the topic of Latinx health communication. The article is pretty neutral and all claims are backed up by facts without direct quotes. Viewpoints are precise and to the point- I would not say any are overrepresented. The information comes from 3 different sources, all relating to Latinx health communication and LGBTQ+ Latinx folks. All sources are at most only 10 years old.

There is a lead sentence with a strong introduction on what to expect when reading about this topic. As for words to watch, “Latino/a LGBTQ sexuality often remains unaddressed” may sound biased due to “often.” Overall, though, the paragraphs are brief and informative. This is written in third person and does not focus too much on one scholar/source. It is well paraphrased and cited. She did not, however, cite every 2 sentences but instead cited at the end of every paragraph. Audrat09 (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey A,
 * Thanks for your feedback. I plan on adjusting my sandbox to prevent biases by avoiding the words on the "Wiki words to watch" list. I will also cite every two sentences instead of three. I will also try to make each paragraph a little more detailed so they are not as brief. Missy-Squishy 24 (talk) 17:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Dr. E's Review
H, please see Canvas for my feedback on Words to Watch with puffery and editorializing, connecting the sections together more in the next draft, and explaining jargon. Great start here on connecting your ideas and trying out the Wiki style. Brianda will also join with some feedback too this week. OsaRosa (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey Dr. E,
 * Thanks for your feedback. I will connect my sections more in the next draft by looking for similar concepts within each article. I will replace or delete words that have too much implication or bias. I will also explain jargon by providing definitions for each word that the reader might not understand or know before reading the article. I will also replace some of the wording with stronger alternatives. Missy-Squishy 24 (talk) 17:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)