User talk:MisterMicros

July 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.  MrOllie (talk) 00:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Out of curiosity, how is that different than the sentence directly before the one added? MisterMicros (talk) 00:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Is it ok to add without linking? I want to contribute and make the article better. MisterMicros (talk) 00:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Draft:Rolex 1908 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. The text came from various advertisements/commercial web pages--and of course the thing as a whole was purely promotional. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Drmies, does this mean Rolex would be the only one who can create the page? Or could you help me? Because I really want to create my first article and have it be on this new model because it changes how Rolex is going to product watches moving forward. It is a significant historical event in horology. Please help, thanks! MisterMicros (talk) 17:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but what? I don't think you understand what Wikipedia is. This has nothing to do with the creator of the product. Surely Hitler and Stalin didn't write World War II, and humans wrote squirrel. You need to write stuff based on what secondary sources say. A new Rolex model is unlikely to have been written up by secondary sources, and you cannot base content on promotional material. You also can not copy text from other websites. Drmies (talk) 00:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, this is something you might could use. It's another one of those awful men's stuff magazines, but the article itself is not totally promotional. This is decent too. With those two you should be able to write up a decent two or three paragraphs, and then of course we need $22,000 to get the actual watch. Drmies (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for the feedback and advice! Woah, what??!!!???? We would need the actual watch in order to write a wiki article about it? What if I go try one on? MisterMicros (talk) 20:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Personal commentary in articles
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Flow network. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)