User talk:MisterSlade

February 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Breitbart, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   06:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 United States presidential debates, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger  talk   06:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Newslinger All of the information that I added was true. How did I vandalize anything? MisterSlade (talk) 06:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * In Special:Diff/1074240566, you deleted the "far-right" descriptor and the two citations of reliable sources that were attached to it, without adequate explanation. You also removed the text "a false figure given that the actual number was 487,000" along with a citation of FactCheck.org, also without adequate explanation. Please do not remove reliably sourced content from articles without adequate explanation, as that is vandalism. Since the edits you have made to the 2020 United States presidential debates article have been disputed, please discuss them at Talk:2020 United States presidential debates if you would like to propose them again. —  Newslinger  talk   06:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Andrew Breitbart. Fragrant Peony (talk) 06:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi MisterSlade! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Andrew Breitbart that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   06:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Newslinger you're directly complicit in wikipedia spreading misinformation MisterSlade (talk) 06:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's policy against vandalism prohibits removing reliably sourced content from articles without adequate justification. Reliably sourced content is not "misinformation". If you are not sure whether a proposed change meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please feel free to ask on the talk page of the corresponding article. —  Newslinger  talk   06:55, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @Newslinger Wikipedia is a joke. For the worlds "largest free encyclopedia," all of the articles regarding controversial topics are skewed to an an extremely far left viewpoint. Ministry of Truth. MisterSlade (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles are written from a neutral point of view, which reflects the consensus of reliable sources; none of the reliable sources that you removed without explanation are "far-left". If you do not like this policy, an alternative outlet may be a better fit for you. —  Newslinger  talk   07:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alerts
—  Newslinger  talk   06:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Andrew Breitbart, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —  Newslinger  talk   06:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)