User talk:Mister Denial

Speedy deletion of Supernova Cult
A tag has been placed on Supernova Cult requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 14:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aderlass Clothing


The article Aderlass Clothing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lack of third-party sources make notability hard to judge, and articles does not currently assert any other claim to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This article had been nominated for speedy deletion due to these concerns; rather than delete it, however, I chose to go with this option, as your article does show a bit of effort and I have a hunch that given some time you'll be able to get these issues taken care of. Please let me know if you need some help. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 17:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)