User talk:Mister Ishmael

Speedy deletion nomination of Oko M. Drammeh


A tag has been placed on Oko M. Drammeh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Noah 💬 21:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Noah. I tried to move it to my user page because it needs a lot of work. Still getting a handle on Wiki, replying talks, and writing neutral articles. I was also wondering how you were able to see most of the errors and conflicts. It'll help me get better if you can show me how to navigate that.

April 2021
Hello Mister Ishmael. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Oko M. Drammeh, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mister Ishmael. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

Thanks for the feedback. I've been trying to figure out how to reply for a while so I have a lot of work to do. I am not being paid for this service nor do I know the subject personally. I am aware of his work and he is a notable. After reading through some of the comments, I acknowledge that it doesn't seem or sound neutral as I was writing from a narrative point of view, trying to piece it all together. Clearly, I am a novice at writing Wiki pages. I'd love some pointers and suggestions on what I can do to clean it up and such. Still getting a handle on this. Appreciate your feeedback.