User talk:Mister Xip

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.
 * Welcome!

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

SPMUDA International Human Rights Commission
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, SPMUDA International Human Rights Commission, may be copied from http://www.tmipu.org.in/sihrc.htm. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 17:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi, I've now deleted this article because
 * the article was a copyright violation. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I noticed that you removed the tag advising the addition of other sources, but you didn't add any new references. I assume that means you couldn't find any, so the topic isn't notable
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Your article just repeated the organisations spammy mission statement, nothing about the organisation itself.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:40, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.