User talk:Misterpither/Archive 1

Orphaned non-free image File:Tyson Foods 2017 logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tyson Foods 2017 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Colouring Book, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Producer and Strings. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted Gärdestad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Starship: I'm accused of vandalism?
Hello, You said you restored this article due to "vandalism" apparently by me because I made a lot of edits. What is the evidence of the vandalism?I am contributing current and accurate information, so I'm puzzled. Also, I restored it back, and then read I should have discussed it with you first. I am sorry about that, but I'm new at this. Also, I apologize if this is redundant because I posted it on the article page, too. There are so many different areas of Wiki that it is a bit of a maze especially to a newer user like myself. I hope to gain some experience on doing this correctly so you're input would be appreciated. Regards, Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)Cheryl Fullerton
 * Cheryl, I don't have much time to provide evidences of vandalism due to my time constraints, but I'll give you inputs; You're not keeping the article encyclopedic and neutral. You are pushing the Chaquico/Kantner-purist side of the Jefferson Starship/Starship further. We don't need that kind of it here. Besides, this isn't a Jefferson Airplane-Starship-Starship fan website. Vandalism isn't just "bad commentaries" or "deleting the entire article", it comes in all shape and size. "Jefferson Starship is the name currently being used by a band line-up that was in place at the time of founder, Paul Kantner’s passing". To prioritize a popular 1970s band's ongoing lawsuit since the 1980s is just rather opinionated. It's like more like bringing up a fact in the lead paragraph, which is unnecessary for a well written article about the band and it's history unless you're writing a separate article about the lawsuit concerning Kantner and whoever-it-may-be. Just because Paul Kantner passed away doesn't mean it should be written like that. For example, the last remaining original founder and one of the owners of the band name Yes, Chris Squire passed away in June 2015, yet I don't see others reverting to that style you use in the Jefferson Starship article. A band's article should focus on their balanced history, not highly on the name issue. Your recent edits have shown the opposite of it. Again, as I wrote, I don't have too much time to look for the evidences due to my tight schedule, so it's up to you to decide what went wrong.   You removed the reference citations on the article "Starship". You should be careful when you rewrite the article. References are crucial and should not be carelessly misused. You are also glorifying their achievement in the lead paragraph of Starship's article. Their achievements should be discussed in another separate passage of the article. Several article writers of The Beatles have never done this and wrote "The Beatles were the No. 1 all time best selling band with 11 Grammy awards".  You're formatting the article improperly.  Jefferson Starship is alive and well despite the lawsuit (it hasn't been updated since April, I don't know why).If you're going to bring up Chaquico-Barbata-Sears, they're not considered THE Jefferson Starship, but they're in a similar case of what Anderson Wakeman and Rabin would be at Wish I could write more, but I gotta go Misterpither (talk) 21:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Cheryl, I don't have much time to provide evidences of vandalism due to my time constraints, but I'll give you inputs; You're not keeping the article encyclopedic and neutral. You are pushing the Chaquico/Kantner-purist side of the Jefferson Starship/Starship further. We don't need that kind of it here. Besides, this isn't a Jefferson Airplane-Starship-Starship fan website. Vandalism isn't just "bad commentaries" or "deleting the entire article", it comes in all shape and size.

"Jefferson Starship is the name currently being used by a band line-up that was in place at the time of founder, Paul Kantner’s passing". To prioritize a popular 1970s band's ongoing lawsuit since the 1980s is just rather opinionated. It's like more like bringing up a fact in the lead paragraph, which is unnecessary for a well written article about the band and it's history unless you're writing a separate article about the lawsuit concerning Kantner and whoever-it-may-be. Just because Paul Kantner passed away doesn't mean it should be written like that. For example, the last remaining original founder and one of the owners of the band name Yes, Chris Squire passed away in June 2015, yet I don't see others reverting to that style you use in the Jefferson Starship article. A band's article should focus on their balanced history, not highly on the name issue. Your recent edits have shown the opposite of it. Again, as I wrote, I don't have too much time to look for the evidences due to my tight schedule, so it's up to you to decide what went wrong.

You removed the reference citations on the article "Starship". You should be careful when you rewrite the article. References are crucial and should not be carelessly misused. You are also glorifying their achievement in the lead paragraph of Starship's article. Their achievements should be discussed in another separate passage of the article. Several article writers of The Beatles have never done this and wrote "The Beatles were the No. 1 all time best selling band with 11 Grammy awards".

You're formatting the article improperly.

Jefferson Starship is alive and well despite the lawsuit (it hasn't been updated since April, I don't know why).If you're going to bring up Chaquico-Barbata-Sears, they're not considered THE Jefferson Starship, but they're in a similar case of what Anderson Wakeman and Rabin would be at Wish I could write more, but I gotta go Misterpither (talk) 21:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Misterpither, Originally, the JS article was heavily Paul Kantner and Airplane heavy. The entire beginning of the article was titled “Origins” and it was filled with unsourced material (needing citations) about the history of Jefferson Airplane and Paul Kantner’s solo career and his daughter being born, etc… This article is supposed to be about Jefferson Starship and the history of THAT BAND and not Airplane and Kantner or even Slick. I am attempting to correct that error by focusing on the details of JS, which is a band that started in 1974, two years after Airplane broke up. Airplane has its own article. As for adding more correct details about Craig Chaquico in the article, I also found that what had been there originally was either incorrect or inadequate as far as his history with the band. I believe I also made an addition or change or two to what was up there about Pete Sears and Johny Barbata because whomever had written the article previously had left weakened their influence in the band as well. In other words, it was extremely unbalanced toward Kantner and Slick’s past history and Airplane as opposed to the band, Jefferson Starship. I am attempting to balance it correctly by my edits. I don’t think there has been any new public information with regards to the 2017 lawsuit to add to the article as of yet.Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)Cheryl Fullerton

Starship Page
Hello Misterpither

I'm wondering if it might make more sense to have separate pages for "Starship" and "Starship with Mickey Thomas"? They were two entirely different bands with different personnel. Does that make any sense to you? Most bands do go through many different personnel, but there were only 3 core members of "Starship" when they were performing, Brett Bloomfield, Mark Morgan, and Kenny Stavropoulus. i'm considering those edits to what stands now, as well, as removing the last paragraph which is really about a different band, "Starship featuring Mickey Thomas". Also, if the Mickey Thomas version of the band is deleted, The entry of Loveless Fascination should be deleted from the discography if I delete. The 2013 version of the band is not legally "Starship" it is simply short-hand for "Starship with Mickey Thomas". What say you? How difficult would making two different pages be? Looking forward to your reply. Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Cheryl Fullerton
 * Unless there's at least several reliable sources that indicates that "Starship" and "Starship with Mickey Thomas" are both different bands without any blurs between them (I doubt they would be, since a Rolling Stone article indicates that these are the same), Starship featuring Mickey Thomas must have at least one of their notability criterias checked if you seriously want to make a separate article of it; but in my opinion, they're no different to me. Personally I would want to make a redirect page of it, if I was being in an uncertain state about whether they're separate or not, and draft it in the sandbox at a later time. Misterpither (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:November En Ny Tid Ar Har 1970.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:November En Ny Tid Ar Har 1970.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Take a look
..at the article about Kenneth Gärdestad if you wish. I will nominate it for DYK in a few days time. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 23:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Anne Murray
Portal:Anne Murray, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Anne Murray and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Anne Murray during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 04:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GTOsPermanentDamage1969.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GTOsPermanentDamage1969.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CAN Halleluwah 1971 B side single cover.png
Thanks for uploading File:CAN Halleluwah 1971 B side single cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Albums produced by Anders Glenmark


A tag has been placed on Category:Albums produced by Anders Glenmark indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anni-Frid Lyngstad compilation albums


A tag has been placed on Category:Anni-Frid Lyngstad compilation albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, Misterpither,
 * Sometimes editors empty out a category so that it appears on our Empty Categories list. That's why we inform category creators with notices like this and wait 7 days in case a category has been emptied "out of process". Leaving the categories a week before deletion can allow correction in case categories are just temporarily empty. I'm glad that you edit frequently enough that you saw these messages and could remedy their emptiness. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frida 4xCD 1xDVD Cover Art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Frida 4xCD 1xDVD Cover Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swing You Sinners 1930.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Swing You Sinners 1930.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PlanetFitnessLogo1.png
Thanks for uploading File:PlanetFitnessLogo1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)