User talk:Mistersaintlaurent

E-mail 'There Was A Time' to RonaldCarrol@hotmail.com. The fans have had enough of 'I have secured them' & 'I haven't leaked anything'. If you really are a fan, you should know not to tease us like this. If you continue like this, you will be worse than the hoarders you stole from.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. One Night In Hackney 303 12:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed maintenance notices from, even though required changes haven't been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. One Night In Hackney 303 12:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance notices from articles on Wikipedia. It may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. One Night In Hackney 303 14:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. One Night In Hackney 303 21:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Start again
We seem to have got off on the wrong foot, so I'll try making a fresh start. The maintenance tag I added isn't a negative tag, it's to let editors know that the article needs sources other than primary sources. The tag isn't a sign that your article is about to be deleted from Wikipedia, for example see Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2006 which has 200 articles on the first page and it isn't even out of the letter A. Hopefully editors other than yourself will actually edit the page as well, so if they do it becomes obvious that work needs doing on it. Making a personal attack on the editor who added the tag and repeatedly removing it wasn't particularly helpful, as it was only going to make me less willing to help you. With regards to sources, the ones you have added now are fine, but I do suggest you take a look at what we consider reliable sources. Tripod (and similar) hosted sites are not acceptable, because this is an encyclopedia and we prefer to rely on credible sources. I realise there's probably a contradiction in that if someone has paid for a domain name their site could be seen as more reliable, but I can assure you many .com sites are seen as equally unreliable. You seem to be on the right track sourcing wise anyway, not every single piece of information in the article needs to be sourced but the more the better especially in terms of anything relevant but minor trivia doesn't need sourcing as much. Hope that helps, thanks. One Night In Hackney 303 09:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tag
A tag has been placed on Mister Saint Laurent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BrianGV talk  13:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

"autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged"...see WP:AUTO ... BrianGV talk  14:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Mister Saint Laurent
A template has been added to the article Mister Saint Laurent, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 21:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of Mister Saint Laurent for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mister Saint Laurent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mister Saint Laurent & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 17:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)