User talk:Mistyben

Helloo, Mistyben. I see you have not yet been welcomed. Permit me to be the first to welcome you to Wikipedia! Click on welcome for some helpful links on how to edit. I see you have already begun contributing-- thank you!

I have changed a few of your edits, for the reasons in the edit summaries. If you want to discuss it, post a note on the article's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! Kablammo 19:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Individual locomotives and notability
I tagged one of the articles that you have been adding because of its lack of references (and the same could be done of others). However, I think there is a wider question of whether each unit is sufficiently individually notable to merit an article of its own in Wikipedia? To take a couple of examples, Norfolk Southern 1070 and Norfolk Southern 1071 are the same models. Would it not be better to roll all of these units into a single article, and demonstrate their collective notability there with reliable 3rd party references? AllyD (talk) 08:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I was following the same way these 6 articles are laid out, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_1996 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_1983 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_1982 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_1988 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_1989 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_1995

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1068


The article Norfolk Southern 1068 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1069


The article Norfolk Southern 1069 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1070


The article Norfolk Southern 1070 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1071


The article Norfolk Southern 1071 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1072


The article Norfolk Southern 1072 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1073


The article Norfolk Southern 1073 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 1074


The article Norfolk Southern 1074 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8025


The article Norfolk Southern 8025 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8114


The article Norfolk Southern 8114 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8105


The article Norfolk Southern 8105 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8104


The article Norfolk Southern 8104 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8103


The article Norfolk Southern 8103 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8102


The article Norfolk Southern 8102 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8101


The article Norfolk Southern 8101 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8100


The article Norfolk Southern 8100 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8099


The article Norfolk Southern 8099 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norfolk Southern 8098


The article Norfolk Southern 8098 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable railway engine. No evidence of in-depth coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NS Heritage Series
Template:NS Heritage Series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Moon by Mistyben.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Moon by Mistyben.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ✗ plicit  13:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)