User talk:Mital2003

April 2018
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Thiruvalluvar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 17:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hinduism, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   07:08, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nalanda. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please see WP:BURDEN, WP:OR and WP:FORUM for more information. JimRenge (talk) 11:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Thiruvalluvar. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Tirukkuṛaḷ, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock
Mital2003 (talk) 20:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I've just noticed that at least one of your additions was a copyright violation. You must not copy material from other places into Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Boing!
Which was a copyright violation pls? Mital2003 (talk) 08:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The addition has been revision-deleted now, so I can't show you the actual diff. It was an addition to Kutchi people, which appeared to be a direct copy from http://www.agrocel.co.in/kutch/people.htm (and which also appears at different web sites). You need to write all new material in your own words, and not copy directly from other sources. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:11, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Firstly, I hv not taken anything from that website u mention. Secondly, taking info from a public portal is not violation of copyright. Why don't you read the rules of Wikipedia & also get enough info before pointing fingers at someone wrongly?
 * Hi. You might not have taken it from that site specifically - as I said, the same text also appears at different web sites. But it's got nothing to do with "public portal" - unless it is published explicitly with a CC BY-SA license or freer, then it is a copyright violation (because Wikipedia content is onward licensed as CC BY-SA). The several copies I found of that text were on sites which all had copyright statements which were not suitable for Wikipedia, reinforcing the fact that reproducing the text on Wikipedia is a copyright violation. Anyway, I'm not trying to point fingers, I'm just trying to help you avoid some of the problems that new editors often face. Please have a read of Copyright violations. Finally, even if there is freely available text on a site somewhere that's suitably licensed, it's rarely directly suitable for a Wikipedia article, and material added to Wikipedia should be written in your own words - ie we should use sources for information, but not directly for text. I also urge you to read Plagiarism, which is applicable too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)