User talk:Mitch884

Speedy deletion of Mitchell Gallagher
A tag has been placed on Mitchell Gallagher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — BradV 23:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Tranquillo Barnetta
Please stop adding transfer speculations. Wikipedia is not sports daily. --Jaellee (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a newspaper and is not a collection of speculative 'reports'. Please cease these unencyclopedic edits to Tranquillo Barnetta. Regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The same applies to the article Steve Gibson (businessman), where you added rumours about a potential investment. These are unverified speculations. I hope you understand that Wikipedia is not the proper venue for such speculations, and I hope you understand that we can't take your word for it that it's true. Aecis·(away) talk 15:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You have have placed the transfer speculation back into the article yet again. I'm going to give you a final warning now. Stop this. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)