User talk:MitchellPreston

Hey.

Message sent.

Welcome!
Hello, MitchellPreston, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
 Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Running, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 20:56, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I am striking the above message because it is not specific enough and may appear too critical. The main problem actually is that you removed (inadvertently, I think) the footnotes. Simply putting the (repeated) footnote numbers in brackets will not provide a direct link to the footnotes. Contrary to usual, readers would need to look at the footnote section directly in order to find the reference. Providing a direct link allows the reader to go directly to the reference and back to the article. It also allows seeing the reference by hovering over it, although this may require checking on box somewhere on the preference pages. The first instance of a reference that will be repeated should not have a plain . "Source 1" in the ref name should be without a break (only 1 word or a combination word and number, usually the page number), which refers in some way to the reference. Often the author's name. Then when the reference is repeated, your text can contain  . Note that this includes an extra /. Otherwise, you will get an error message - the reason for which may not be obvious. This format will link to the original footnote, which will show superscript letters for each use - these will link back to the specific use of that reference.


 * I think you have kept the balance between benefits and injuries but in any situation like this, the guidelines specify being a little careful about not downplaying (such as through removal of sourced or apparently correct content). On the other hand, the guidelines also specify that undue weight should not be given to a minority view or minor point. Neutral point of view.


 * I am sorry for not being more specific and hope this will not discourage you. Good luck to you in future editing. Although you may not need it, I follow this with a list of helpful Wikipedia page links.


 * Introduction to Wikipedia; and Contributing to Wikipedia; and Wikipedia tutorial; and Getting started
 * Avoiding common mistakes; and How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified ruleset; and Simplified Manual of Style; and Manual of Style
 * List of policies; and List of guidelines
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia; and What Wikipedia is not; and Manual of Style/Words to watch
 * Identifying reliable sources; and Verifiability; and No original research; and Neutral point of view
 * How to copy-edit; and How to create your first article
 * Help:Referencing for beginners; and Help:Footnotes
 * Help:Introduction to talk pages; and Help:Using talk pages; and Talk page guidelines
 * Copyright Problems; and Copyright violations; and Images; and Image use policy
 * Help:Contents and Questions provide guidance and links to pages where help can be requested. Also see Teahouse.


 * If you indent a line (without using some markup like a colon), you will get a strange looking box and some of your text may even run off the screen.


 * There are quite a few links above and some of them provide further links. However, some of the pages are short, some you may not need to look at, at least right of way and I think you can get the gist of the others reasonably quickly. It is good to know that there is some online help at Wikipedia if you know where it is.


 * Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages (but not article edits) by typing four tildes (~) ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions or ask your question on this page and then place Help me before the question. You may also ask me a question on my user talk page and I will answer it, if I can, or try to refer you to a page or person that might help, the next time I am online at Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 01:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)