User talk:Mitchellc99

May 2020
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rape in English law have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello Duncan hope you are well, I believe what I added was constructive, as it says a “ he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,” I believe that a man can also be penetrated by the Anus and mouth by either a man or female, due to a female can have access to various “sex toys” which can be forced onto a man, so it can be their penis, and in which they can penetrate. Mitchellc99 (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rape in English law. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''You are repeatedly falsifying a direct quotation from an Act of Parliament. You must stop this. '' DuncanHill (talk) 23:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)