User talk:Mitchsdiamond

Welcome!

Hello, Mitchsdiamond, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Variable length flexible stylus, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Max Semenik (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Variable length flexible stylus


The article Variable length flexible stylus has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability not established, no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Max Semenik (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

to link to silverpoint drawing. as to promotional... will remove any reference to invented by. Keep definition clear and concise. support by illustration. as to notability...I will cite page number from Cennini, Watros, Amers-Lewis Mitchsdiamond (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Rewwritten to account for WP:GNG, WP:OR and WP:COI

ADDRESSING WP:GNG Significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. Refer to silverpoint characteristics. The stylus is a subject that is directly addressed in detail of the main topic of silverpoint.

ORPHAN links to silverpoint, silverpoint links to VLFS.

WP:OR and WP:COI have been addressed.

Silverpoint has been edited shifting VLFS to characteristics.

Variable length flexible stylus
Small text A geometrical drawing instrument. A variety of instrument used in making a silverpoint drawing. Differing from a rigid stylus3,6 whose tip is honed to varying degrees of sharpness, the VLFS is used to measure and emulate a grayscale value1 such as the photographic Zone System developed by Ansel Adams and Fred R. Archer, where subtle variations in rendering subject shading4 are controlled by the length of a flexible silver wire7 protruding from its holder. The formula, Vn ƒ LF, based on the laws of potential energy teaches that the Value number is a Function of the Length of a Flexible stylus as it protrudes from its holder. Potential energy at the tip of the stylus decreases as the length of the flexible stylus increases resulting in a lighter value on the drawing surface. Potential energy at the tip of the stylus increases as the length of the flexible stylus decreases resulting in a darker value on the drawing surface. Setting the stylus to an intermediate length produces values in relation to its length according to an associated shading guide that quantifies the values. Mitchsdiamond (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Refrences
1-Adams, Ansel, “The Negative”, Book 2, Little Brown and Company, Boston, 1984, The Zone System, page 49-97. 2-Ames-Lewis, Francis "Drawing In The Italian Renaisssance Workshop", Victoria and Albert Museum, London, 1983,pages 44–45 3-Cennini, Cennino d’Andrea, “The Craftsman’s Handbook” Translated by Thompson ,Jr. Daniel,Dover Publications, Inc., New York, page 5. 4-Kemp, Martin, “Leonardo on Painting”, Translation, Yale University Press, 1989, “There are two principal parts into which painting is divided: firstly the outline which surround the shapes of solid bodies – and these outlines require draughtsmanship;  and secondly what is called shading.” 6-Watros, James, "The Craft of Old-Master Drawing", University of Wisconsin Press, Metalpoint Tools, page 3-33. 7-Heydenreich, Ludig H., "Leonardo the Inventor",ISBN 0091426618, 1981, diagram of a device mechanizing a technique for forming wire., page 86.

Mitchsdiamond (talk) 13:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! RadioFan (talk) 22:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, Mitchsdiamond. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 22:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Silverpoint concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Silverpoint, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Silverpoint


Hello Mitchsdiamond. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Silverpoint".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 1 March 2014 (UTC)