User talk:Mitchua

brilliant work on office robbery statistics. it was just deleted but i plan on fighting for your revision to be kept, as it contained meaningful and relevant substance within the appropriate style guidelines.

i'm isismelting on aim if you'd like to message me.

sincerely jayme ryan

--Harlequence 05:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mitchua. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Spencer T• C 04:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Just a fan of the brand from the 90s and noticed there wasn’t an entry when I read that blog to article Mitchua (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Northern Reflections


The article Northern Reflections has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP, sourcing is all press release or blog"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Northern Reflections for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northern Reflections is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Northern Reflections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2022 (UTC)