User talk:Mithilalok

Welcome
Mithilalok (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mithilalok/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Mithilalok/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Mithilalok/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Mithilalok (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC) Please Vist My Website www.mithilalok.com and unblocek me..

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mithilalok


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Mithilalok, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 08:57, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC) Mithilalok (talk) 11:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi again
Hi, Mithilalok. The reviewing admin Ohnoitsjamie has told you your previous unblock request didn't address the reason for your block, so there's really no point in posting another request that just repeats the first. I can't believe you've read the Guide to appealing blocks that you've been linked to. Please click on the link now and read. Note that there's no way you will be unblocked for the purpose of writing about your own organisation, but only if you intend to write about some topic other than your organisation. Also your username is against our rules. I seem to be repeating myself a lot, you've already been told these things. Please try to take it in. I'd format your second unblock request for you if there was any point, but there really isn't, sorry. I suggest you read the Guide to appealing blocks, re-read my original block notice, and try again. Please post at the foot of this page, not the top. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC).

UTRS Account Request
I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Mithilalok (talk)