User talk:Mithridates

Archive up to 2011

please look your korea user talk page
질문드렸습니다. 와 주세요.--클렌더스 (talk) 07:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

도움이 필요합니다
헝가리어판 백과의 Vadász Bea 문서에 한국계 일본인 성우인 박로미가 일본식 발음인 Paku Romi로 적혀있길래 Romi Park로 고쳤습니다. 그런데 다른 사용자분이 되돌려놨더군요. 제가 근거를 대며 Romi Park라 고치면 그 분이 박박 우겨대며 되돌려놓습니다. 분명 한국사람이니 Romi Park이 맞을텐데, 대체 이 사람은 무슨 사고방식을 갖고 있는 걸까요? 어쩌면 좋을까요? 112.158.15.62 (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dave MacLeod.jpg


The file File:Dave MacLeod.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Interlingua
Dear colleague Mithridates, did you confuse interlingue with interlingua, or do you speak both? Yours sincererly, Sockenschütze (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, I did not confuse the two. Why do you ask? Interlingua I was a fan of for a while back in 2005 or so but for about 10 years now I have only preferred Interlingue/Occidental. Mithridates (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

I have seen on the site https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Mithridates the category Kategorie:User ia-2 when I was searching for Interlingua-experts. I wonder if I should learn it. --Sockenschütze (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. I haven't updated my user pages on quite a few Wikipedias now. I can now only recommend Occidental/Interlingue, but others may have their own preferences. I can probably help more if you have any reasons in particular for wanting to learn it - otherwise I'll just continue to recommend the one I believe to be best. For example even as a propagator of Occidental I might recommend LFN for someone who really wants to learn a Romance creole, and Ido to someone who wants something like Esperanto but with reversability and no accented letters. Mithridates (talk) 09:58, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Please excuse me, I am tousled. What ist LFN? --Sockenschütze (talk) 11:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Auch das ist eine Plansprache: Lingua Franca Nova oder Elefen (LFN). Ich meine, es gibt viele davon und es ist schwer zu sagen, welche du solltest lernen, weil es immer eine persönliche Sache ist. Persönlich seit 2009 mag ich nur Okzidental/Interlingue, und Interlingua nicht mehr. Mithridates (talk) 12:00, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Lieber Kollege Mithridates, ich danke dir, dass du mir auf Deutsch antwortest. Das ist sehr nett von dir. Dein Deutsch ist überraschend gut. Für mich ist es verwirrend, weil ich nicht genug über Plansprachen weiß. Einen Experten würde ich fragen: Gibt es eine beste Plansprache? Lohnt es sich, sie zu lernen? Ist es vorteilig für die internationale Verständigung, wenn keiner der Sprecher seine Erstsprache spricht? Gilt das gleichwertig für das geschriebene Wort? --Sockenschütze (talk) 12:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Oh, nichts zu danken – Deutsch ist nämlich meine Lieblingssprache – in Europa, mindestens. Es ist immer ein Vergnügen, auf Deutsch zu schreiben!

Das sind schwere Fragen.

Eine beste Plansprache: ich glaube, dass es zwei Typen gibt: die Plansprachen wie Esperanto, und die wie Okzidental/Interlingua. Der erste Typ ist fast komplett autonom und sein Wert liegt in der Sprache selbst. Ich meine, diejenige, die Esperanto lernen, jetzt kann Esperanto sprechen, aber niemand kann sie ohne Vorstudien verstehen. Aber diejenige, die Okzidental / Interlingua lernt, kann diese Sprachen benutzen aber auch viele andere Leute kann die Sprache verstehen, weil die Wörter sind internationaler (crear -> creation -> creatura, sole -> solari -> sol-sistema, nómine -> nominar -> nomination usw). Dasselbe Ding kann man sehen mit anderen regionalen Plansprachen wie Interslavic, aber natürlich sind sie ziemlich schwächer: nur zwei oder dreihundert Million können sie verstehen ohne Vorstudien…das ist nicht schlecht, aber im Vergleich mit den romanischen Sprachen sehen sie sehr klein aus.

Für mich die beste Sprache ist die Sprache, die 1) verstehbar, 2) regelmäßig, und 3) autonom ist. Die andere Sprachen sind wie folgende:

Esperanto: die am größten Plansprache. Nicht verstehbar, regelmäßig, autonom.

Ido: Kleiner, ein bisschen verstehbarer aber nicht viel, regelmäßig, autonom.

Interlingua: Verstehbar, nicht regelmäßig, nicht autonom.

Interlingue/Okzidental: Verstehbar, fast regelmäßig, autonom.

Bei autonom meine ich, dass die Sprache seine eigene Wörter machen darf.

Lohnt es sich, sie zu lernen? -- Ich glaube ja, aber man muss verstehen, dass diese Sprachen noch sehr klein sind. Selbst Esperanto ist eine kleine Sprache. Und es gibt manchmal eine bestimmte Feindseligkeit zwischen die Sprachen – man muss erinnern, dass diese Sprachen Wäre sind, ganz wie Apple und Samsung oder Microsoft und Linux. Das endgültige Ziel einer Plansprache ist *die* Weltsprache werden. Natürlich sind die zwischensprachliche Beziehungen manchmal gut, aber nicht immer. Ich persönlich bin immer friedlich und habe gute Beziehungen mit anderen Sprachen, auch Esperanto. Aber beim Nutzen mag ich nur Okzidental.

Internationale Verständigung: ich glaube ja. Mit diesen Sprachen ist man immer in Beziehung mit Menschen von diesem oder einem anderen Land, also ist eine komplette internationale Unverständigung fast unmöglich. Aber als ein Instrument von Weltfrieden ist eine Plansprache ein bisschen übertrieben.

Das am schönsten mit einer Plansprache ist, dass man fast immer sicher ist, dass man sie korrekt schreibt! Es ist faszinierend, eine Sprache zu benutzen, wo man weiß (nach ein paar Wochen Training), dass man sie benutzen kann, ohne Fehler. Auf diese Weise fühlt man sich etwas egaler, etwas zuversichtlicher. Mithridates (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Wenn ich dich richtig verstanden habe, sind die Vorteile der Interlingue gegenüber der Interlingua (nach deiner Meinung) eine größere Regelmäßigkeit und eine größere Autonomie. Dazu stelle ich die Frage: Ist diese Autonomie wirklich vorteilig? Die Befürworter der Interlingua sagen, es sei ein Vorteil, dass die meisten Wörter aus normalen Sprachen importiert seien. Übrigens, wenn ich dich korrigieren darf, lautet der Plural von Ware Waren und nicht Wäre. --Sockenschütze (talk) 14:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Danke - also Waren und nicht Wäre. Jetzt schreibe ich mit dem Handy vor Schlafe . Ja, eine Sprache braucht mindestens ein bisschen Autonomie. Sieh mal z.B. wo Interlingua seine eigene Wörter nicht machen darf, wie balena (Walfish und Barte), villano (englisch villager und villain), ungul (Nagel und Hufe) usw. wo die gemeinsame Etymologie lasst Interlingua keine Wahl. Auch beim Derivation hat Interlingua sehr viel unregelmäßig Verben, in Okzidental nur sechs (sieh mal li regul de Wahl). Der große Unterschied zwischen die Sprachen ist dass Interlingua importiert die internationale Wörter aber Okzidental dieselbe Wörter selbst machen kann. z.B. miss-er, e-miss-er, e-miss-ion, miss-ion-ario, hier Interlingua braucht mitt-er aber miss- für Derivationswörter. Auch select-er, select-ion ist in Interlingua selig-er, select-ion, auch poss-er, poss-ibil, poss-ibil-itá aber in Interlingua pot-er und poss-ibile, usw. Zu viel Unregelmässigkeit für mich. Eigentlich gab es eine andere Interlingua, die Interlingua von Peano, die älter als Okzidental ist! Und auch diese Interlingua hat die Doppelverbes seliger - select-, poter - poss- usw. Aber De Wahl glaubte, dass man eine naturale aber gleichzeitig regelmässige Sprache machen konnte. Darum brauchte er fast 30 Jahre um sie vollzuziehen.

Morgen werde ich mehr schreiben! Mithridates (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
Just as a heads up in case you didn't get an alert, I've added comments to the Interlingue Peer Review. Jerry (talk) 02:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks! No, I didn't notice until you left the message here and I had completely forgotten about the peer review as nothing had happened there until you read it. I'll try to incorporate some of what you've mentioned there this weekend. Mithridates (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

interlingue.org
Salute. Ante mult annus yo creat li situ interlingue.org con informationes pri Occidental e li Interlingue-Union. Ante quelc annus, quelc activistes accusat me, que mi ortographie confuse novicios e interessatos, e yo devet abandonar li projecte. Regretabilmen till hodie ti situ sta vacui e ínutilisat.

Yo vide, que Vu ja durant pluri annus es activ por interlingue. Esque forsan Vu vole utilisar li adresse de interlingue.org e per to anc auxiliar al Interlingue-Union recuperar su representantie in li web? Yo ha tande dat li technic possession a sr. Werner in Suissia, e yo crede, que il vell esser injoyat, si alquí vell denov vivificar li situ. Forsan Vu va considerar contactar le. --Sebastiano (talk) 21:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Ah bon, mersí! Yo ha esset recentmen in contact con Erich (yo scrit un articul por li numeró de Cosmoglotta a venir) e ne savet que il possedet li págine por interlingue.org. Yo self es (amatorimen) programmator ma nor situ https://occidental-lang.com/ esset creat de un altri amico con quel yo coresponde dialmen. Yo va proposir li idé de revivificar li situ a ti amico e contacter Erich pri li afere. Noi have un altri amico qui nu vive in La Chaux-de-Fonds e labora quelcvez al biblioteca de CDELI, e il es sempre interessat pri coses oficial: li statu del Union, in quel locs it es activ, etc., e anc il have un incontra arangeat con Erich quande Covid va ameliorar se. Anc il va esser interessat in revivificar li situ, yo crede. Mithridates (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interlingue
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interlingue you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interlingue
The article Interlingue you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Interlingue for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Comparison between Interlingue and Interlingua for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison between Interlingue and Interlingua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Comparison between Interlingue and Interlingua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JBchrch  talk  17:45, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Ia vs Ie
Hi. Archiving my talk page for the year. My comment there was that I suspect our description of the vowel system is inaccurate, so that /o/ ends up being pronounced as /a/ and /a/ as /e/, but I don't have the sources to fix it properly. — kwami (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Interlingue
The article Interlingue you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Interlingue for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Interlingue
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2737 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Mail
In case it did not come through, please give me a ping (I noticed that the form acted a bit strange). Daniuu (talk) 11:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hmm, nothing yet. I do seem to recall getting emails pretty late from Wikipedia though. Here's my email so maybe send it there:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/__e2VLp6gwyk/SlS_iLvoBrI/AAAAAAAAETg/6OOdGb6GaS8/s1600/email.PNG Mithridates (talk) 12:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EdgeDB (November 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EdgeDB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:EdgeDB Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EdgeDB reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EdgeDB (December 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EdgeDB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:EdgeDB Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stuartyeates&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:EdgeDB reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 04:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:EdgeDB


Hello, Mithridates. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "EdgeDB".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)