User talk:Mithulilruc

Welcome!
Hi Mithulilruc! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Megaman en m (talk) 08:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Mithulilruc. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mithulilruc. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:00, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Mithulilruc (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) Hi, Hammersoft, I am a video gamer and has been playing games for more than 20 years. I joined wikipedia to contribute because I found there are some games missing or need to be introduced clearer here. So what I countributed editing was all about game titles or game contents. I am absolutely not paid by anybody for editing so I consider there is nobody can be diclosed to be my financial stake.

Your submission at Articles for creation: UNO Mobile (December 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zxcvbnm were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UNO Mobile and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UNO Mobile, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UNO_Mobile Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zxcvbnm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UNO_Mobile reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of UNO (mobile game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article UNO (mobile game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UNO (mobile game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

 * Please disclose your other accounts as a sign of good faith. -- ferret (talk) 15:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Ferret, thanks for your reply. My other anounts are Leihuo0001 and Netease Thunderfire UX. The latter one was once blocked for promotional and advertising. The reason I guess was i submitted articles with words and expressions that seemed promotional. Although I rephrased some expressions and kept in mind being as neutral as possible, it did not get through reviews. I think what I did wrong was to not being neutral and not dealing with the issue as actively as possible, but instead used other accounts to edit on wikipedia (wanted to see my articles to be published on wiki as soon as possible). I apologies. Besides, there might be some issue with the user name of it. Although I did not know about it before, it will definitely be kept in my mind. I'll be following wikipedia guides and what admins tell me to do in the future if I could get a unblock: not using multiple accounts, read and learn more about wiki expressions and do not seem promotional, beware of proper user names, edit and contribute to wiki as careful as possible, and all other wiki guides. Thanks.Mithulilruc (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with whatever you decide here, but a one account restriction and not circumventing AFC (These 3 accounts have multiple declined drafts on the same topics as well as multiple main space deletions, some having been AFD'd and some Speedy'd) would be good. -- ferret (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing my request, Ferret and Yamla. I'll be using ONLY one account (this one) to contribute/edit more on wiki and if there are articles to be created, I'll be using article wizard and definitely will not try to circumvent AFC for any reason again. Thank you.Mithulilruc (talk) 04:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, Yamla, sorry to ping you. I was wondering if I could get an unblock or not so that I could continue contributing on wikipedia. I'll be strictly following one account restriction and definitely will not circumventing AFC. Thanks for you review.Mithulilruc (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I have already reviewed an unblock request from you and declined it. Someone else will review your current one. There's nothing I can do for you. --Yamla (talk) 10:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. May I ask if there is any way to request for additoinal review from other admins? Thank you.Mithulilruc (talk) 12:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Reviewing admins: As the checkuser who blocked, I give blessing to move forward with this unblock as you see fit. -- ferret (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Who is ? Is that another of your accounts? Why are your accounts named after NetEase and constantly adding promotional content related to that company? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, NinjaRobotPirate, User Thunderfire UX is not my account and I have no connection with this account. I am gamer for more than 20 years and have been playing video games of different genres and companies for a long time. That is why I have been contributing to articles related only to games of different developers around the world. I remember I've edit some articles about games from the US, Japan and some other countries. NetEase is a game development company, yet I am not meant to promote it for any business promotional purpose while editing on wikipedia. Several games I've been playing for a period of time happned to be developed by this company and adding neutral infomation (which I thought was neutral but might seem a bit promotional according to wikipedia guidelines) to these games seemed a bit like advertising. I truly apologize for that. As a contributor who is new on wikipedia for less than a year, I definitely need spend much more time to read through various guidelines about multiple accounts restriction, avoiding promitional expressions, using proper ways to submitt articles. All I wanted to do was to let people know more about those video games I played and loved, or games that I could find reliable citations for. And I did not edit articles that I am not familiar with. My purpose was not to harm, yet some of my behaviors brought damgages to wikipedia community. I am sorry about that.I will be strictly following wikipedia guidelines and what admins tell me to do when editing anything on wikipedia using only one account. And trying my best to be neutral and not seem promotional will be kept in my mind at any time.Thank you for reviewing my request. Mithulilruc (talk) 03:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, NinjaRobotPirate, I swear if I am paid to edit to peomote products of NetEase, I would have disclosured that. And NetEase is an already existing article and seems not complete (after you mentioned, I checked the page), I would do first thing of adding more promotional descriptions of its products to it directly. Yet that was not what I did. I am not here to promote any companies and I am not paid to make edits. I've thought through my mistakes these days and gave plans and steps to avoid potential vandalism to wikipedia. Please reconsider. Thanks. Mithulilruc (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * But you fail to explain what Netease Thunderfire UX is, despite admitting the account with that name is yours. These accounts are all making promotional edits to NetEase related articles and adding text along the lines of "NetEase Thunderfire UX is contributing to...", and almost all of the edited articles with issues are listed on ThunderFire UX's webpage. That's pretty damning. The opportunity to come clean seems to have passed. -- ferret (talk) 13:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)