User talk:Mitisetfortis

Welcome!
Hello Mitisetfortis, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Minima ©  ( talk ) 17:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Cork Student News page
David,

Have only received Google Alert updating me to recent changes to Wikipedia page for Cork Student News now.

This is my Wikipedia account, cannot offer information on who other IP addresses belong to. I take issue with your recent edits for the following reasons, as well as your claim that I have 'continually' edited the page since earlier this summer.

Firstly, with regard to the decision to close the website this July, this was not 'my' decision (thus your claim that the website was closed by its creator and owner is false). As explained the reason for the website's closure, at least as things stand currently, is to pursue a bigger project. Although this was not explicitly stated in the closure note, the decision to close the site, given involvement of teams for both prior and subsequent venture, could not have been taken by me unilaterally.

Secondly your 'controversies' section which the previous user deleted is simply absurd and libelous.

With regard to the phone bill article, nobody has explicitly described us as a 'tabloid' in respect of this. Unless you can cite a credible and impartial source that has made this charge, I suggest you refrain from making unsubstantiated comments.

Secondly, the other 'controversy' you cite, concerning an article in relation to UCC Ogra Fianna Fail - this article was part of the satire section, clearly marked as such, and did not even concern the subject matter which you impute to it. Furthermore, no complaints were received on foot of it. Again, I completely fail to see the 'controversy' you seek to invent with which to denigrate the website's reputation.

Perhaps the one binding thread between the two controversies you seek to concoct, if I can discern one, is a desire to somehow tie these to two articles to the website's closure, announced shortly subsequent to both of these articles.

Unfortunately there was no connection whatsoever, and as I explained earlier, the decision to suspend the website (its final form is still undecided) was taken on foot of news of business space for an expanded ventured, and had nothing whatsoever to do with earlier cited articles.

I trust that this clears up some of the misunderstandings you seem eager to foster about the website. As mentioned unless you have any substantiation for your earlier points please do not vandalize page again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielocarroll (talk • contribs) 16:28, 24 August 2011 (UTC)