User talk:Mitra2412

In response to your feedback
I am glad that your Wikipedia experience is going well and that you are happy! Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

If you need help editing,
 * Check out the tutorial.
 * Wanting to create an article? Use the article wizard.
 * See the manual.

Cheers, Riley Huntley  (Click here to reply)   07:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Benoy K Behl promotion
Please stop. If you continue spamming Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, Mitra2412. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
 * http://.indiamonuments.org
 * http://.frontlineonnet.com
 * http://.benoykbehl.com

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Your Userpage Deleted as Advertising
Your userpage is not to be used as advertising or promotion as a pseudo-article. Remember that Wikipedia is not a social network like Twitter or Facebook. You may not host your own website, blog, wiki, or cloud at Wikipedia. Your userpage is for anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It is a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Please see Introduction and User page for more information. Thanks.--Hu12 (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  05:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * So far your only point of interest on Wikipedia had been this person and his website. It is apparent that you have a conflict of interest regarding him, so one of unblock conditions will likely be a cessation of all edits related to Benoy K Behl. Knowing this, are you interested in doing something else on Wikipedia? Max Semenik (talk) 08:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I would be willing to unblock you under the condition that you agree to never again link to Behl's site or anything he has written, and, when writing about him, only ever include information that is verified by independent reliable sources (that means, you can't use his own writing or speeches as a source, or other blogs, etc.). Are you willing to follow these requirements? If so, I will contact the blocking admin and see what he says. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As an uninvolved admin I would concur with these conditions for unblock; no use of his writings or speeches, and no link to him or his pages. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * You're not getting it. Wikipedia isn't here to provide links to things Behl has written. Period. While, if his articles are WP:RS (for example, if they're opinion pieces, they wouldn't be, no matter who publishes them), then they could be used to verify things in other articles, but the Behl article itself certainly wouldn't need those. And the fact that you seem to be trying to find any way possible to link to as much as possible makes me think that you're not here to make this a better encyclopedia, but to promote Behl. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I fixed your template above. I'm on the fence myself; I'll let another admin take a look. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:25, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely clear what you mean by "what Wikipedia has suggested." I'd be fine unblocking you under the terms proposed above, specifically "you agree to never again link to Behl's site or anything he has written, and, when writing about him, only ever include information that is verified by independent reliable sources". Are you open to those terms? Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 15:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)