User talk:Mitzin93

Welcome!
Hello, Mitzin93, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Mitzin93's Peer Review
Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic of the how Robert Gober used art to fund for the Aids Epidemic. The article is neutral and does not take any specific side or is not persuading the audience to choose one section. It is just basic information on Robert Gober's contribution to help with the AIDs epidemic. There are no claims or frames that are biased toward any particular position. No there are no viewpoints that are over presented or under presented. All the citations are up to date. Overall, I loved reading the section that you added because it was quite interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdhillon8 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review of Robert Gober
Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes the article is relative to Robert Gober and his works. Nothing really negative to distract me, however I would like the Exhibition section to be broken into paragraphs.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article seems unbiased, I don't see any charged or biased words.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Good coverage of many aspects of Gober's works and activism.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes the citations work and are used appropriately to support claims.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? The articles come from the Art AIDS America book, as well as from art websites. These sources are neutral.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? No information out of date. I would like to see more examples of his AIDS activism though. More works and what they meant, or what he meant to convey.JuslopezCSUEB (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)