User talk:Mixedreviews

June 2020
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Transracial (identity), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Please provide inline citations for the proposition that examples such as Rachel Dolezal do not represent a proper use of the term (or an example of) transracial identity if you wish to make that claim. Please note Neutral point of view/FAQ.


 * Please also note: Verifiability. "In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. When reliable sources disagree, maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight."


 * Also, please note that the proper way to handle two viewpoints supported by citations, and particularly if a new view contradicts or changes the current text, is to cite a reliable, verifiable source for the second viewpoint or contradiction but not to delete the other one. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Transracial (identity). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Your edit was not minor. Please read WP:MINOR. Your material was not an appropriate addition to "Further reading". It is an external link to a list of resources. And why did you remove the existing Further reading link?'' Meters (talk) 03:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If anywhere that link would belong in the "External links" section. Please see WP:EL Meters (talk) 03:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)