User talk:Mixereditor

May 2021
Hello, I'm Bennv123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Little Mix, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv123 (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Joshua Bassett (actor), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   13:23, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Little Mix, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bennv123 (talk) 23:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

how do you add a reliable source on here? Mixereditor (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, you can refer to Help:Referencing for beginners. Bennv123 (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I've noticed that you've been adding and removing information from Little Mix related articles, I would like to ask you to please stop removing information from the lead paragraphs. If you'd wish to remove info, please explain your reason for the removal. When adding additional info, please cite reliable sources before publishing them. Also keep in mind to add a summary of your changes whenever you edit an article so that it would be easier for other editors to monitor the page. Thank you! --GabbyManahan01 (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

I've been removing the information and putting it all into one category, which you have been removing also. so i will learn to add reliable sources but stop removing the information that I'm putting and adding into separate categories Mixereditor (talk) 14:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

The information in the lead paragraph are important. Only the things that you think is not necessary to be in the lead are the ones needed to be removed. Infos such as certifications and highest chart positions (UK or any other peaks) can be added in the lead. These info can also be added to the "Commercial performance" section. If you wish to put it in that section, you may do it, but please dont remove it from the lead paragraph. I hope you understand. --GabbyManahan01 (talk) 07:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

okay, I understand Mixereditor (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Glory Days (Little Mix album). Binksternet (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
You have been warned numerous times to stop adding unsourced claims to Wikipedia articles. Please stick to what the sources you are citing actually say, and do not add your own original research (much of which has thus far been inaccurate or unverifiable). The claims made in your most recent edit for instance, are not supported by the source you cited. Please also stop marking edits in which you add new content as minor. If you continue to make disruptive edits, you are likely to be blocked from editing. Bennv123 (talk) 23:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Little Mix. Binksternet (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Don't revert editors without explanation
Please explain your revert of me on Heartbreak Anthem. https://www.top40.nl/top40/2021/week-28 shows the new peak of 23 for the song. There was no reason for your revert.  Ss  112   22:54, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Heartbreak anthem charted in other countries and it's been taken off the list. It needs to be added back Mixereditor (talk) 22:55, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You're reverting edits that were perfectly valid. Those edits have nothing to do with what you're talking about.  Ss  112   22:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Well then how do I find the original text that was taken away Mixereditor (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * By going through the edit history and reverting that specific edit, not every edit that has been made since. This appears disruptive. Stop making reverts of me and other editors who have nothing to do with what you're talking about.  Ss  112   22:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

people can make a mistake you know when editing. Mixereditor (talk) 23:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You just reverted another edit of mine that has nothing to do with what you're talking about. You've already been reported for disruptive editing. You obviously have no idea what you're doing. Competence is required when editing. You've made about five "mistakes" in the last few minutes.  Ss  112   23:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Mixereditor, all of your article edits since your last block expired have been reverts. If you can't find a way to edit that doesn't involved smashing the revert button, I will reblock your account.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Heartbreak anthem charted in Macedonia, United Arab Emirates, Malta and Venezuela. They have been put on the charting edits for weeks and someone has removed them. I am just putting them back Mixereditor (talk) 23:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You are four reverts at Heartbreak Anthem. If you don't undo your last revert there immediately, you will be blocked. Take your concerns to the talk page.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Mixereditor, those charts were removed because they were sourced to Radiomonitor/Radioairplay.fm, which has been deemed unreliable. Please see Wikipedia talk:Record charts.  Ss  112   23:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Don't even bother blocking because I'm just going to leave. All I tried to do was to bring back edits that was once removed and I'm being made to feel like I'm the one in the wrong. forget this app Mixereditor (talk) 23:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, it's an encyclopedia, not an app, so that may explain some of your confusion. When editing here you are expected to follow our policies and guidelines. If you don't think you can do that at this time, then perhaps it's best to take a break and perhaps return when you are willing to accept the responsibility collaborative editing requires. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Forum posts are not reliable sources
Posts or comments made by random people on internet forums are not reliable sources. Please stop using them as sources e.g.. Bennv123 (talk) 16:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

okay i understand Mixereditor (talk) 16:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)