User talk:Mixitcat

August 2015
Hello, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to William McKinley— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Anthony Weiner seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zero Hedge, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   08:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

—  Newslinger  talk   08:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Zero Hedge, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger  talk   02:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Zero Hedge. —  Newslinger  talk   11:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Zero Hedge; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger   talk   11:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hi Mixitcat! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Zero Hedge that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   11:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Proud Boys. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Graywalls (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)