User talk:Mixonioes

This is just my opinion on this users' behavior and string of repeated vandalism: I can't even imagine the extent or the level of vandalism you've exercised without eloquently contributing to Wikipedia. Just pure blasphemous addition of strings of random characters, even going forward and putting over a offensive sexual and/or directly link of a penis. This, in my humble opinion and it may also represent widespread views. The way you've vandalised and been an alleged sleeper account for over 3 years is just ridiculous and pure nonessential merit and even expanding to nonsensical insertions you've made. Being dormant for a lot of time, I thought you may be return with a emphasis of constructively collaborating with Wikipedia, you just failed to do that. It's quite clear you're not here for lending a great hand in Wiki-projects, you're here just to disrupt and make personal attacks for those who revert your edits. This again in my very humble opinion, a very problematical behavior I've observed in your account. Your interests were over Paris Delegation-related articles from which you expanded your expertise to other articles, to perform vandalism, sought sugar-coated word turned libelous harassment, even going further and editing putting over external links which are completely inappropriate for Wikipedia and totally unnecessary. You legit know your thoughts, the behaviorism continued throughout and your fallacies involved into articles. Practically, every editor knew your stance and reverted all your vandalism in time (for which we have tools I'm proud of). If only you come up with a excuse like your Brother did this, it was not me, got compromised, snatched by other people, etc. It will definitely won't work right now. Be serious about it. We are a online collaborative project working through a detailed fundamental principle which is its very core, called consensus. Do you even know how much time it takes to get cleared through everyones' mind and decide a generality for a context to be verified and established? May be you know, or may be, you wouldn't. Depends, given these edits I'm not ascertained to prioritise your motive of getting us and our Community getting vandalised. There's no point in vandalising. Infact vandalism is pointless and any of the editors will revert them in a second with spotting it out by some dedicated tools given for it. You're misguided, clueless and have no background on Wikipedia. That's my point on you. If you gather the courage and bring a change, we can change the world and make this a planet within, where each and every human may have the equal access to each sum of knowledge through just a medium, and that's it. It's Wikipedia.

Regards,

The IP 182.58.205.181 (talk) 16:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thai cuisine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thai cuisine was changed by Mixonioes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939732 on 2016-01-10T07:39:07+00:00.

September 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Age of Enlightenment has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Age of Enlightenment was changed by Mixonioes (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854686 on 2016-09-25T18:00:43+00:00.

November 2016
Hello, I'm Zppix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Paris Agreement— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paris Agreement. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. KylieTastic (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Onel5969, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:KylieTastic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 12:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Konrayd Korsikovsky


A tag has been placed on Konrayd Korsikovsky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at YouTube, you may be blocked from editing. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:07, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:SkyGazer 512. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 15:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)